illiteracy: is social

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents problem
Weight: 0.66
, obstacle
Weight: 0.59
, challenge
Weight: 0.58
, issue
Weight: 0.58
, factor
Weight: 0.56
Siblings inequality
Weight: 0.35
, mental health problem
Weight: 0.34
, thyroid problem
Weight: 0.33
, hunger
Weight: 0.33
, overpopulation
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is social 1.00
is social problem 0.88
be related to social change 0.88
is major social problem 0.84
be cause social problem 0.83
is social justice issue 0.83
influence social policy 0.82
be cause social evil 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(problem, be related to social change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(illiteracy, is social)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(factor, influence social policy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(illiteracy, is social)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(illiteracy, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(factor, influence social policy)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(illiteracy, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(problem, be related to social change)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(problem, be related to social change)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(factor, influence social policy)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is social)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is social justice issue)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is major social problem)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is social)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is social problem)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is social problem)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(problem, be related to social change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(illiteracy, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(illiteracy, is social)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(factor, influence social policy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(illiteracy, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(illiteracy, is social)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(illiteracy, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(hunger, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(hunger, is social)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(illiteracy, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(inequality, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(inequality, is social)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(illiteracy, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(inequality, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(inequality, is social problem)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(illiteracy, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(hunger, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(hunger, is social problem)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(illiteracy, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(hunger, is social justice issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(hunger, is social justice issue)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(illiteracy, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(hunger, is major social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(hunger, is major social problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(illiteracy, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(illiteracy, is social)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(illiteracy, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(illiteracy, is social problem)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(illiteracy, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, be cause social problem)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(illiteracy, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(illiteracy, is social problem)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(illiteracy, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, be cause social evil)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(illiteracy, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(illiteracy, is social problem)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(illiteracy, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(illiteracy, be cause social problem)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(illiteracy, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(illiteracy, be cause social problem)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(illiteracy, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(illiteracy, be cause social evil)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(illiteracy, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, is social problem)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(illiteracy, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(illiteracy, be cause social evil)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(illiteracy, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(illiteracy, be cause social problem)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(illiteracy, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(illiteracy, be cause social evil)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(illiteracy, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(illiteracy, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, is social)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(illiteracy, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(illiteracy, is social)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(factor, influence social policy)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(problem, be related to social change)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(inequality, is social)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(hunger, is social)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(inequality, is social problem)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(hunger, is social problem)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(hunger, is social justice issue)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(hunger, is major social problem)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(illiteracy, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(factor, influence social policy)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(illiteracy, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(problem, be related to social change)