problem: be related to social change

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mental health problem
Weight: 0.77
, issue
Weight: 0.65
, puzzle
Weight: 0.65
, complaint
Weight: 0.63
Siblings thyroid problem
Weight: 0.80
, toothache
Weight: 0.68
, inequality
Weight: 0.68
, macular degeneration
Weight: 0.68
, limitation
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related to social change 1.00
be related to change 0.91
is social 0.88
is social problem 0.83
regard cross cultural issues resolved in workplace 0.77
be different from sociological problems 0.76
solve important in organizational settings 0.75
be with climate changes 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(problem, be related to social change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is social)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(problem, be related to social change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is social problem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(problem, be related to social change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(inequality, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(inequality, is social)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(problem, be related to social change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(inequality, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(inequality, is social problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(problem, be related to social change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(problem, be related to social change)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(problem, be related to social change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(problem, regard cross cultural issues resolved in workplace)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(problem, be related to social change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(problem, regard cross cultural issues resolved in workplace)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(problem, be related to social change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(problem, solve important in organizational settings)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(problem, be related to social change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(problem, regard cross cultural issues resolved in workplace)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(problem, be related to social change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(problem, regard cross cultural issues resolved in workplace)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(problem, be related to social change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(problem, solve important in organizational settings)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(problem, be related to social change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(problem, be different from sociological problems)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(problem, be related to social change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(problem, be different from sociological problems)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(problem, be related to social change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(problem, solve important in organizational settings)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(problem, be related to social change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(problem, be different from sociological problems)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(problem, be related to social change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(problem, solve important in organizational settings)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(problem, be related to social change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(problem, be different from sociological problems)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(problem, be related to social change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(problem, be related to social change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(problem, be related to social change)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(problem, be related to social change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(problem, be related to social change)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(problem, be related to social change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(inequality, is social)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(problem, be related to social change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(inequality, is social problem)