hunger: is social justice issue

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents desire
Weight: 0.66
, sensation
Weight: 0.64
, need
Weight: 0.62
, problem
Weight: 0.62
, symptom
Weight: 0.61
Siblings famine
Weight: 0.34
, starvation
Weight: 0.34
, thirst
Weight: 0.34
, mental health problem
Weight: 0.34
, ambition
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is social justice issue 1.00
is justice issue 0.96
is social problem 0.83
is social 0.83
be related to social change 0.79
is major social problem 0.79
regard cross cultural issues resolved in workplace 0.78
is issue 0.78
has quality injustice 0.77
is important issue 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(problem, be related to social change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(hunger, is social justice issue)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(problem, regard cross cultural issues resolved in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(hunger, is social justice issue)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(hunger, is social justice issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(problem, regard cross cultural issues resolved in workplace)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(hunger, is social justice issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(problem, be related to social change)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is social justice issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(problem, be related to social change)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is social justice issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(problem, regard cross cultural issues resolved in workplace)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is social justice issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(starvation, is issue)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is social justice issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(famine, is issue)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is social justice issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(starvation, has quality injustice)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(problem, be related to social change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(hunger, is social justice issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(hunger, is social justice issue)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(problem, regard cross cultural issues resolved in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(hunger, is social justice issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(hunger, is social justice issue)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(hunger, is social justice issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(starvation, has quality injustice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(starvation, has quality injustice)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(hunger, is social justice issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(famine, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(famine, is issue)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(hunger, is social justice issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(starvation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(starvation, is issue)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(hunger, is social justice issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(hunger, is social justice issue)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(hunger, is social justice issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(hunger, is social)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(hunger, is social justice issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(hunger, is social problem)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(hunger, is social justice issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(hunger, is issue)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(hunger, is social justice issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(hunger, is issue)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(hunger, is social justice issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(hunger, is issue)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(hunger, is social justice issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is major social problem)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(hunger, is social justice issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(hunger, is social)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(hunger, is social justice issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is important issue)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(hunger, is social justice issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(hunger, is social problem)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(hunger, is social justice issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(hunger, is major social problem)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(hunger, is social justice issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(hunger, is important issue)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(hunger, is social justice issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is issue)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(hunger, is social justice issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(hunger, is important issue)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(hunger, is social justice issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(hunger, is social)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(hunger, is social justice issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(hunger, is major social problem)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(hunger, is social justice issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(hunger, is social problem)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(hunger, is social justice issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(hunger, is important issue)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(hunger, is social justice issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(hunger, is major social problem)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(hunger, is social justice issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is social)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(hunger, is social justice issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is social problem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(hunger, is social justice issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(hunger, is social justice issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is social justice issue)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(hunger, is social justice issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(hunger, is social justice issue)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is social justice issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(problem, be related to social change)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is social justice issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(problem, regard cross cultural issues resolved in workplace)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is social justice issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(starvation, is issue)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is social justice issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(starvation, has quality injustice)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is social justice issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(famine, is issue)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.13
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(hunger, is social justice issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(problem, be related to social change)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(hunger, is social justice issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(problem, regard cross cultural issues resolved in workplace)