famine: is issue

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tragedy
Weight: 0.64
, problem
Weight: 0.59
, catastrophe
Weight: 0.58
, word
Weight: 0.56
Siblings starvation
Weight: 0.35
, hunger
Weight: 0.34
, desertification
Weight: 0.33
, overpopulation
Weight: 0.32
, flood
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is issue 1.00
is global issue 0.87
has state problem 0.78
be ongoing problem 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(famine, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is global issue)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(famine, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is issue)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(famine, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(starvation, is global issue)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(famine, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(hunger, has state problem)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(famine, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(desertification, has state problem)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(famine, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has state problem)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(famine, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is issue)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(famine, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(starvation, has state problem)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(famine, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(starvation, is issue)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(famine, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(starvation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(starvation, is issue)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(famine, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(overpopulation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is issue)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(famine, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(hunger, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(hunger, is issue)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(famine, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(overpopulation, is global issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is global issue)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(famine, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(starvation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(starvation, has state problem)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(famine, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(starvation, is global issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(starvation, is global issue)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(famine, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(hunger, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(hunger, has state problem)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(famine, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(desertification, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(desertification, has state problem)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(famine, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(overpopulation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, has state problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(famine, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(famine, is issue)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(famine, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(famine, is global issue)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(famine, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(famine, has state problem)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(famine, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(famine, is global issue)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(famine, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(famine, be ongoing problem)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(famine, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(famine, is global issue)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(famine, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(famine, has state problem)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(famine, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(famine, has state problem)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(famine, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(famine, has state problem)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(famine, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(famine, be ongoing problem)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(famine, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(famine, is global issue)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(famine, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(famine, be ongoing problem)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(famine, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(famine, be ongoing problem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(famine, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(famine, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(famine, is issue)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(famine, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(famine, is issue)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(famine, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(starvation, is issue)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(famine, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is issue)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(famine, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(hunger, is issue)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(famine, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(starvation, has state problem)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(famine, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is global issue)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(famine, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(starvation, is global issue)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(famine, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(hunger, has state problem)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(famine, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(desertification, has state problem)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(famine, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(overpopulation, has state problem)