hunger: is issue

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents desire
Weight: 0.66
, sensation
Weight: 0.64
, need
Weight: 0.62
, problem
Weight: 0.62
, symptom
Weight: 0.61
Siblings famine
Weight: 0.34
, starvation
Weight: 0.34
, thirst
Weight: 0.34
, mental health problem
Weight: 0.34
, ambition
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is issue 1.00
is important issue 0.97
be issue in world 0.92
is global issue 0.87
be such issue in world 0.87
is justice issue 0.82
regard cross issues resolved 0.79
has state problem 0.78
regard cross issues resolved in workplace 0.78
regard cross issues 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(famine, is global issue)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(starvation, is global issue)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(starvation, is issue)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(famine, is issue)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(famine, has state problem)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(starvation, has state problem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(hunger, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(famine, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(famine, is issue)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(hunger, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(starvation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(starvation, is issue)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(hunger, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(starvation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(starvation, has state problem)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(hunger, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(starvation, is global issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(starvation, is global issue)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(hunger, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(famine, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(famine, has state problem)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(hunger, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(famine, is global issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(famine, is global issue)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(hunger, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(hunger, is issue)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(hunger, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(hunger, be issue in world)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(hunger, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(hunger, be issue in world)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(hunger, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(hunger, be issue in world)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(hunger, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(hunger, be such issue in world)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(hunger, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(hunger, be such issue in world)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(hunger, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(hunger, be such issue in world)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(hunger, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is important issue)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(hunger, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(hunger, is important issue)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(hunger, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(hunger, be issue in world)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(hunger, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(hunger, be such issue in world)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(hunger, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(hunger, is important issue)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(hunger, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(hunger, has state problem)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(hunger, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(hunger, has state problem)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(hunger, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(hunger, is important issue)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(hunger, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(hunger, has state problem)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(hunger, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(hunger, has state problem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(hunger, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(hunger, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is issue)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(hunger, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(hunger, is issue)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(starvation, is issue)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(famine, is issue)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(starvation, is global issue)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(starvation, has state problem)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(famine, is global issue)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(famine, has state problem)