overpopulation: is issue

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents issue
Weight: 0.66
, crisis
Weight: 0.65
, problem
Weight: 0.65
, topic
Weight: 0.65
, factor
Weight: 0.62
Siblings thyroid problem
Weight: 0.35
, inequality
Weight: 0.34
, mental health problem
Weight: 0.34
, desertification
Weight: 0.33
, illiteracy
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is issue 1.00
is global issue 0.87
is problem brainly 0.80
regard cross issues resolved 0.79
has state problem 0.78
regard cross issues resolved in workplace 0.78
regard cross issues 0.78
be problem for society 0.77
be cause problem 0.77
matter 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(issue, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is issue)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(overpopulation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(issue, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(issue, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, is global issue)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(desertification, is problem brainly)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, be cause problem)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(desertification, has state problem)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, is issue)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, has state problem)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is global issue)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be problem for society)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is issue)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(inequality, has state problem)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(inequality, matter)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(issue, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(overpopulation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is issue)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(overpopulation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(inequality, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(inequality, is issue)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(overpopulation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(illiteracy, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(illiteracy, is issue)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(overpopulation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(inequality, is global issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(inequality, is global issue)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(overpopulation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(inequality, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(inequality, has state problem)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(overpopulation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(inequality, matter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(inequality, matter)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(overpopulation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(illiteracy, is global issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(illiteracy, is global issue)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(overpopulation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(desertification, is problem brainly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(desertification, is problem brainly)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(overpopulation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(inequality, be problem for society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(inequality, be problem for society)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(overpopulation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(desertification, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(desertification, has state problem)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(overpopulation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(illiteracy, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(illiteracy, has state problem)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(overpopulation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(illiteracy, be cause problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(illiteracy, be cause problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(overpopulation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(overpopulation, is issue)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(overpopulation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is global issue)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(overpopulation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(overpopulation, is global issue)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(overpopulation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is global issue)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(overpopulation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(overpopulation, matter)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(overpopulation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has state problem)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(overpopulation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, matter)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(overpopulation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is global issue)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(overpopulation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(overpopulation, has state problem)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(overpopulation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(overpopulation, matter)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(overpopulation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, matter)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(overpopulation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, has state problem)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(overpopulation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(overpopulation, has state problem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(overpopulation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is issue)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(overpopulation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is issue)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(issue, has state problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(inequality, is issue)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(illiteracy, is issue)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(inequality, is global issue)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(inequality, matter)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(inequality, has state problem)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(illiteracy, is global issue)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(desertification, is problem brainly)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(desertification, has state problem)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(inequality, be problem for society)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(illiteracy, has state problem)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(illiteracy, be cause problem)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(overpopulation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(issue, has state problem)