inequality: matter

Related concepts

Parents	problem Weight: 0.68 , barrier Weight: 0.61 , issue Weight: 0.61 , evil Weight: 0.59 , topic Weight: 0.58
Siblings	illiteracy Weight: 0.35 , poverty Weight: 0.35 , polarization Weight: 0.35 , injustice Weight: 0.34 , overpopulation Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property	Similarity
matter	1.00
is issue	0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(inequality, matter) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is issue)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(inequality, matter) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, is issue)

0.01

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(inequality, matter) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(poverty, matter)

0.01

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(inequality, matter) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, matter)

0.01

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(inequality, matter) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Remarkable(injustice, is issue)

0.01

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(inequality, matter) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(poverty, is issue)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.19

Plausible(inequality, matter) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

Remarkable(overpopulation, matter) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Plausible(overpopulation, matter)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.19

Plausible(inequality, matter) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

Remarkable(poverty, matter) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Plausible(poverty, matter)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.19

Plausible(inequality, matter) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

Remarkable(poverty, is issue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Plausible(poverty, is issue)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.19

Plausible(inequality, matter) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

Remarkable(injustice, is issue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Plausible(injustice, is issue)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.19

Plausible(inequality, matter) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

Remarkable(illiteracy, is issue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Plausible(illiteracy, is issue)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.19

Plausible(inequality, matter) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

Remarkable(overpopulation, is issue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is issue)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.19

Plausible(inequality, matter) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Salient(inequality, matter)

Similarity expansion

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.02

Typical(inequality, matter) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Typical(inequality, is issue)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.96

Remarkable(inequality, matter) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(inequality, is issue)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.19

Plausible(inequality, matter) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Plausible(inequality, is issue)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.43

Salient(inequality, matter) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Salient(inequality, is issue)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.43

Salient(inequality, matter) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Typical(inequality, matter) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(inequality, matter)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.19

Plausible(inequality, matter) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Typical(inequality, matter)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(inequality, matter) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Typical(overpopulation, matter)

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(inequality, matter) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Typical(poverty, matter)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(inequality, matter) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Typical(injustice, is issue)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(inequality, matter) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(poverty, is issue)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(inequality, matter) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Typical(illiteracy, is issue)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(inequality, matter) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Typical(overpopulation, is issue)