overpopulation: is economic

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents issue
Weight: 0.66
, crisis
Weight: 0.65
, problem
Weight: 0.65
, topic
Weight: 0.65
, factor
Weight: 0.62
Siblings thyroid problem
Weight: 0.35
, inequality
Weight: 0.34
, mental health problem
Weight: 0.34
, desertification
Weight: 0.33
, illiteracy
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is economic 1.00
be bad for economic growth 0.92
affect economic growth 0.92
is economic problem 0.90
be good for economy 0.85
affect economic inequality 0.85
be bad for economy 0.84
affect economy 0.83
be important from economic standpoint 0.80
related to allocation in economy 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is economic)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(inequality, affect economic growth)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is economic)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is economic)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is economic)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be good for economy)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is economic)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for economic growth)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is economic)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for economy)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is economic)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is economic problem)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is economic)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be important from economic standpoint)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is economic)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(inequality, affect economic inequality)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(overpopulation, is economic)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(inequality, is economic)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(inequality, is economic)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(overpopulation, is economic)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(inequality, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(inequality, is economic problem)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(overpopulation, is economic)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(inequality, affect economic inequality)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(inequality, affect economic inequality)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(overpopulation, is economic)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(inequality, affect economic growth)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(inequality, affect economic growth)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(overpopulation, is economic)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(inequality, be good for economy)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(inequality, be good for economy)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(overpopulation, is economic)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(inequality, be important from economic standpoint)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(inequality, be important from economic standpoint)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(overpopulation, is economic)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(inequality, be bad for economic growth)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(inequality, be bad for economic growth)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(overpopulation, is economic)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(inequality, be bad for economy)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(inequality, be bad for economy)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(overpopulation, is economic)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(overpopulation, is economic)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(overpopulation, is economic)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, affect economy)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(overpopulation, is economic)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(overpopulation, affect economy)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(overpopulation, is economic)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(overpopulation, affect economy)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(overpopulation, is economic)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, affect economy)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(overpopulation, is economic)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is economic problem)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(overpopulation, is economic)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(overpopulation, is economic problem)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(overpopulation, is economic)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is economic problem)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(overpopulation, is economic)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is economic problem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(overpopulation, is economic)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is economic)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is economic)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(overpopulation, is economic)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is economic)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is economic)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(inequality, is economic)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is economic)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(inequality, is economic problem)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is economic)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(inequality, affect economic inequality)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is economic)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(inequality, affect economic growth)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is economic)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(inequality, be good for economy)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is economic)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(inequality, be bad for economic growth)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is economic)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(inequality, be bad for economy)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is economic)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(inequality, be important from economic standpoint)