inequality: be good for economy

Related concepts

Parents	problem Weight: 0.68 , barrier Weight: 0.61 , issue Weight: 0.61 , evil Weight: 0.59 , topic Weight: 0.58
Siblings	illiteracy Weight: 0.35 , poverty Weight: 0.35 , polarization Weight: 0.35 , injustice Weight: 0.34 , overpopulation Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be good for economy	1.00
be bad for economy	0.98
be bad for economic growth	0.89
is economic	0.85
be bad for growth	0.83
affect economic growth	0.83
is economic problem	0.83
be good for society	0.81
be bad for business	0.81
related to allocation in economy	0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(inequality, be good for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is economic)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(inequality, be good for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is economic problem)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(inequality, be good for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(poverty, is economic problem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.11

Plausible(inequality, be good for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

Remarkable(overpopulation, is economic problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is economic problem)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.11

Plausible(inequality, be good for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

Remarkable(poverty, is economic problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Plausible(poverty, is economic problem)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.11

Plausible(inequality, be good for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

Remarkable(overpopulation, is economic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is economic)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.11

Plausible(inequality, be good for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Salient(inequality, be good for economy)

Similarity expansion

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.11

Plausible(inequality, be good for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Plausible(inequality, be good for society)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.13

Salient(inequality, be good for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Salient(inequality, be good for society)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.15

Remarkable(inequality, be good for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Remarkable(inequality, be good for society)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.34

Typical(inequality, be good for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Typical(inequality, is economic problem)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.34

Typical(inequality, be good for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Typical(inequality, is economic)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.13

Salient(inequality, be good for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Salient(inequality, affect economic growth)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.11

Plausible(inequality, be good for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Plausible(inequality, affect economic growth)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.15

Remarkable(inequality, be good for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Remarkable(inequality, affect economic growth)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.11

Plausible(inequality, be good for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Plausible(inequality, is economic)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.34

Typical(inequality, be good for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Typical(inequality, be good for society)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.13

Salient(inequality, be good for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Salient(inequality, is economic)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.34

Typical(inequality, be good for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Typical(inequality, affect economic growth)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.11

Plausible(inequality, be good for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Plausible(inequality, is economic problem)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.15

Remarkable(inequality, be good for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for economy)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.15

Remarkable(inequality, be good for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for economic growth)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.34

Typical(inequality, be good for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(inequality, be bad for economy)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.13

Salient(inequality, be good for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Salient(inequality, is economic problem)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.15

Remarkable(inequality, be good for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for growth)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.15

Remarkable(inequality, be good for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Remarkable(inequality, is economic)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.11

Plausible(inequality, be good for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Plausible(inequality, be bad for economy)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.34

Typical(inequality, be good for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(inequality, be bad for growth)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.13

Salient(inequality, be good for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Salient(inequality, be bad for economy)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.15

Remarkable(inequality, be good for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for business)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.34

Typical(inequality, be good for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(inequality, be bad for economic growth)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.11

Plausible(inequality, be good for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Plausible(inequality, be bad for growth)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.13

Salient(inequality, be good for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Salient(inequality, be bad for growth)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.34

Typical(inequality, be good for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(inequality, be bad for business)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.13

Salient(inequality, be good for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Salient(inequality, be bad for economic growth)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.11

Plausible(inequality, be good for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Plausible(inequality, be bad for economic growth)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.15

Remarkable(inequality, be good for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(inequality, is economic problem)

0.22

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.11

Plausible(inequality, be good for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Plausible(inequality, be bad for business)

0.20

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.13

Salient(inequality, be good for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Salient(inequality, be bad for business)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.13

Salient(inequality, be good for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Typical(inequality, be good for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(inequality, be good for economy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.11

Plausible(inequality, be good for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Typical(inequality, be good for economy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(inequality, be good for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Typical(overpopulation, is economic)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(inequality, be good for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Typical(overpopulation, is economic problem)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(inequality, be good for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Typical(poverty, is economic problem)