inequality: be bad for business

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents problem
Weight: 0.68
, barrier
Weight: 0.61
, issue
Weight: 0.61
, evil
Weight: 0.59
, topic
Weight: 0.58
Siblings illiteracy
Weight: 0.35
, poverty
Weight: 0.35
, polarization
Weight: 0.35
, injustice
Weight: 0.34
, overpopulation
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for business 1.00
be bad for economy 0.84
be bad for growth 0.82
be bad for economic growth 0.81
be good for economy 0.81
has quality bad 0.80
be for businesses 0.80
is bad thing 0.80
is necessarily bad thing 0.77
solve important in business 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(barrier, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(inequality, be bad for business)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(issue, be for businesses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(inequality, be bad for business)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(evil, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(inequality, be bad for business)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(inequality, be bad for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(evil, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(inequality, be bad for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(issue, be for businesses)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(inequality, be bad for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(barrier, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(evil, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(issue, be for businesses)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(barrier, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is bad thing)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(poverty, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(barrier, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(inequality, be bad for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(inequality, be bad for business)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(issue, be for businesses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(inequality, be bad for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(inequality, be bad for business)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(evil, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(inequality, be bad for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(inequality, be bad for business)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(inequality, be bad for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(poverty, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(poverty, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(inequality, be bad for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(overpopulation, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is bad thing)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(inequality, be bad for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(illiteracy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(illiteracy, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(inequality, be bad for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(overpopulation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(inequality, be bad for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(inequality, be bad for business)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(inequality, be bad for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(inequality, be good for economy)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(inequality, be bad for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(inequality, be good for economy)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(inequality, be bad for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(inequality, be good for economy)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(inequality, be bad for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(inequality, has quality bad)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(inequality, be bad for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be good for economy)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(inequality, be bad for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(inequality, is necessarily bad thing)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(inequality, be bad for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(inequality, be bad for economy)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(inequality, be bad for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(inequality, be bad for economy)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(inequality, be bad for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(inequality, be bad for growth)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(inequality, be bad for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(inequality, be bad for growth)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(inequality, be bad for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(inequality, has quality bad)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(inequality, be bad for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(inequality, has quality bad)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(inequality, be bad for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(inequality, be bad for economy)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(inequality, be bad for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(inequality, be bad for growth)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(inequality, be bad for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(inequality, be bad for economic growth)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(inequality, be bad for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(inequality, is necessarily bad thing)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(inequality, be bad for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(inequality, be bad for economic growth)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(inequality, be bad for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(inequality, is necessarily bad thing)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(inequality, be bad for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(inequality, be bad for economic growth)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(inequality, be bad for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for growth)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(inequality, be bad for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for economy)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(inequality, be bad for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for economic growth)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(inequality, be bad for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(inequality, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(inequality, be bad for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is necessarily bad thing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(inequality, be bad for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(inequality, be bad for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for business)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(inequality, be bad for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(inequality, be bad for business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(evil, has quality bad)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(issue, be for businesses)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(barrier, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is bad thing)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(poverty, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(illiteracy, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(overpopulation, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(inequality, be bad for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(evil, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(inequality, be bad for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(issue, be for businesses)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(inequality, be bad for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(barrier, has quality bad)