inequality: is necessarily bad thing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents problem
Weight: 0.68
, barrier
Weight: 0.61
, issue
Weight: 0.61
, evil
Weight: 0.59
, topic
Weight: 0.58
Siblings illiteracy
Weight: 0.35
, poverty
Weight: 0.35
, polarization
Weight: 0.35
, injustice
Weight: 0.34
, overpopulation
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is necessarily bad thing 1.00
is necessarily thing 0.98
is bad thing 0.90
is good thing 0.89
is thing 0.86
mean 0.80
be bad for business 0.77
has quality bad 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(barrier, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(inequality, is necessarily bad thing)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(issue, mean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(inequality, is necessarily bad thing)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(evil, mean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(inequality, is necessarily bad thing)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(evil, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(inequality, is necessarily bad thing)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(inequality, is necessarily bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(evil, mean)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(inequality, is necessarily bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(issue, mean)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(inequality, is necessarily bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(evil, has quality bad)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(inequality, is necessarily bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(barrier, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is necessarily bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(evil, mean)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is necessarily bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(evil, has quality bad)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is necessarily bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(issue, mean)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is necessarily bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(barrier, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is necessarily bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is good thing)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is necessarily bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is necessarily bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is necessarily bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, mean)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is necessarily bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is bad thing)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is necessarily bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(poverty, has quality bad)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is necessarily bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(polarization, mean)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is necessarily bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is thing)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(issue, mean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(inequality, is necessarily bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(inequality, is necessarily bad thing)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(evil, mean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(inequality, is necessarily bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(inequality, is necessarily bad thing)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(barrier, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(inequality, is necessarily bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(inequality, is necessarily bad thing)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(evil, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(inequality, is necessarily bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(inequality, is necessarily bad thing)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(inequality, is necessarily bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(overpopulation, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is bad thing)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(inequality, is necessarily bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(overpopulation, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is thing)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(inequality, is necessarily bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(overpopulation, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is good thing)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(inequality, is necessarily bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(polarization, mean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(polarization, mean)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(inequality, is necessarily bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(illiteracy, mean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(illiteracy, mean)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(inequality, is necessarily bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(poverty, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(poverty, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(inequality, is necessarily bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(illiteracy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(illiteracy, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(inequality, is necessarily bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(overpopulation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(inequality, is necessarily bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(inequality, is necessarily bad thing)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(inequality, is necessarily bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is good thing)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(inequality, is necessarily bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(inequality, is good thing)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(inequality, is necessarily bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(inequality, is good thing)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(inequality, is necessarily bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for business)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(inequality, is necessarily bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(inequality, is good thing)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(inequality, is necessarily bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(inequality, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(inequality, is necessarily bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(inequality, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(inequality, is necessarily bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(inequality, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(inequality, is necessarily bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(inequality, be bad for business)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(inequality, is necessarily bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(inequality, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(inequality, is necessarily bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(inequality, be bad for business)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(inequality, is necessarily bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(inequality, be bad for business)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(inequality, is necessarily bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(inequality, is necessarily bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is necessarily bad thing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(inequality, is necessarily bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(inequality, is necessarily bad thing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is necessarily bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(issue, mean)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is necessarily bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(evil, mean)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is necessarily bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(evil, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is necessarily bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(barrier, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is necessarily bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is thing)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is necessarily bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(illiteracy, mean)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is necessarily bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(polarization, mean)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is necessarily bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is bad thing)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is necessarily bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is good thing)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is necessarily bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(poverty, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is necessarily bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(illiteracy, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is necessarily bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(overpopulation, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(inequality, is necessarily bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(issue, mean)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(inequality, is necessarily bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(evil, mean)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(inequality, is necessarily bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(evil, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(inequality, is necessarily bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(barrier, has quality bad)