illiteracy: has quality bad

Related concepts

Parents	problem Weight: 0.66 , obstacle Weight: 0.59 , challenge Weight: 0.58 , issue Weight: 0.58 , factor Weight: 0.56
Siblings	inequality Weight: 0.35 , mental health problem Weight: 0.34 , thyroid problem Weight: 0.33 , hunger Weight: 0.33 , overpopulation Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality bad	1.00
has quality good	0.96
has quality damn	0.83
be bad for world	0.82
be in quality of life	0.81
be bad for business	0.80
is bad thing	0.79
be bad for growth	0.76
is necessarily bad thing	0.76
feel good	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.91

Plausible(challenge, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Typical(illiteracy, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.23

Plausible(illiteracy, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Plausible(challenge, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(challenge, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Remarkable(inequality, has quality good)

0.12

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has quality good)

0.12

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has quality bad)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(inequality, has quality bad)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(hunger, has quality damn)

...

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.91

Plausible(challenge, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

Remarkable(illiteracy, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Plausible(illiteracy, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.23

Plausible(illiteracy, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

Remarkable(inequality, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Plausible(inequality, has quality good)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.23

Plausible(illiteracy, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

Remarkable(inequality, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Plausible(inequality, has quality bad)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.23

Plausible(illiteracy, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

Remarkable(overpopulation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Plausible(overpopulation, has quality good)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.23

Plausible(illiteracy, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

Remarkable(overpopulation, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Plausible(overpopulation, has quality bad)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.23

Plausible(illiteracy, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

Remarkable(inequality, be in quality of life) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Plausible(inequality, be in quality of life)

...

Salient implies Plausible

0.23

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.23

Plausible(illiteracy, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Salient(illiteracy, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.22

Salient(illiteracy, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Typical(illiteracy, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.23

Plausible(illiteracy, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Typical(illiteracy, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(challenge, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Typical(inequality, has quality good)

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Typical(inequality, has quality bad)

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Typical(overpopulation, has quality bad)

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Typical(overpopulation, has quality good)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Typical(hunger, has quality damn)

...

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.21

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.43

Typical(illiteracy, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(challenge, has quality good)