inequality: be in quality of life

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents problem
Weight: 0.68
, barrier
Weight: 0.61
, issue
Weight: 0.61
, evil
Weight: 0.59
, topic
Weight: 0.58
Siblings illiteracy
Weight: 0.35
, poverty
Weight: 0.35
, polarization
Weight: 0.35
, injustice
Weight: 0.34
, overpopulation
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in quality of life 1.00
be important in life 0.88
be important in real life 0.86
be used in life 0.86
be used in real life 0.85
be use in day life 0.85
has quality good 0.83
has quality bad 0.81
be in life science 0.80
has quality definition 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(barrier, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(inequality, be in quality of life)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(barrier, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(inequality, be in quality of life)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(problem, be in life science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(inequality, be in quality of life)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(evil, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(inequality, be in quality of life)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(evil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(inequality, be in quality of life)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(inequality, be in quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(evil, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(inequality, be in quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(evil, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(inequality, be in quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(problem, be in life science)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(inequality, be in quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(barrier, has quality good)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(inequality, be in quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(barrier, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be in quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(evil, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be in quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(barrier, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be in quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(evil, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be in quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(problem, be in life science)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be in quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(barrier, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be in quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be in quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be in quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be in quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(poverty, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(barrier, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(inequality, be in quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(inequality, be in quality of life)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(evil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(inequality, be in quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(inequality, be in quality of life)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(barrier, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(inequality, be in quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(inequality, be in quality of life)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(evil, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(inequality, be in quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(inequality, be in quality of life)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(problem, be in life science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(inequality, be in quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(inequality, be in quality of life)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(inequality, be in quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(poverty, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(poverty, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(inequality, be in quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(overpopulation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(inequality, be in quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(illiteracy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(illiteracy, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(inequality, be in quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(overpopulation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(inequality, be in quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(inequality, be in quality of life)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(inequality, be in quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(inequality, be used in real life)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(inequality, be in quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(inequality, be used in real life)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(inequality, be in quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be used in real life)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(inequality, be in quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(inequality, has quality good)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(inequality, be in quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(inequality, has quality good)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(inequality, be in quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(inequality, has quality good)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(inequality, be in quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(inequality, be important in real life)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(inequality, be in quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(inequality, be used in life)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(inequality, be in quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be important in real life)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(inequality, be in quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(inequality, be important in real life)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(inequality, be in quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(inequality, be use in day life)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(inequality, be in quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(inequality, be used in life)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(inequality, be in quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(inequality, be used in real life)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(inequality, be in quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(inequality, be use in day life)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(inequality, be in quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(inequality, has quality good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(inequality, be in quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(inequality, be use in day life)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(inequality, be in quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(inequality, be used in life)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(inequality, be in quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be use in day life)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(inequality, be in quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be important in life)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(inequality, be in quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(inequality, be important in life)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(inequality, be in quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(inequality, be important in real life)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(inequality, be in quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(inequality, be important in life)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(inequality, be in quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(inequality, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(inequality, be in quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(inequality, be important in life)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(inequality, be in quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(inequality, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(inequality, be in quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be used in life)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(inequality, be in quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(inequality, has quality bad)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(inequality, be in quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(inequality, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(inequality, be in quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(inequality, be in quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be in quality of life)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(inequality, be in quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(inequality, be in quality of life)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be in quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(evil, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be in quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(barrier, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be in quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(evil, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be in quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(problem, be in life science)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be in quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(barrier, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be in quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(overpopulation, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be in quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(poverty, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be in quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(illiteracy, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be in quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(overpopulation, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(inequality, be in quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(evil, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(inequality, be in quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(evil, has quality bad)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(inequality, be in quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(problem, be in life science)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(inequality, be in quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(barrier, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(inequality, be in quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(barrier, has quality bad)