overpopulation: affect economy

Related concepts

Parents	issue Weight: 0.66 , crisis Weight: 0.65 , problem Weight: 0.65 , topic Weight: 0.65 , factor Weight: 0.62
Siblings	thyroid problem Weight: 0.35 , inequality Weight: 0.34 , mental health problem Weight: 0.34 , desertification Weight: 0.33 , illiteracy Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property	Similarity
affect economy	1.00
be bad for economy	0.91
be good for economy	0.90
affect economic growth	0.88
is economic	0.83
affect growth	0.83
be bad for economic growth	0.83
affect market	0.83
affect business	0.82
is economic problem	0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(factor, affect business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Typical(overpopulation, affect economy)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.37

Plausible(issue, affect market) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Typical(overpopulation, affect economy)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.05

Plausible(overpopulation, affect economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Plausible(issue, affect market)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.05

Plausible(overpopulation, affect economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Plausible(factor, affect business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, affect economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(factor, affect business)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, affect economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(issue, affect market)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, affect economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(inequality, be good for economy)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, affect economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Remarkable(inequality, affect economic growth)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, affect economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for economy)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, affect economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for economic growth)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, affect economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Remarkable(inequality, is economic)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, affect economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(inequality, is economic problem)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(factor, affect business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

Remarkable(overpopulation, affect economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Plausible(overpopulation, affect economy)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.37

Plausible(issue, affect market) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

Remarkable(overpopulation, affect economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Plausible(overpopulation, affect economy)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.05

Plausible(overpopulation, affect economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

Remarkable(inequality, be good for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Plausible(inequality, be good for economy)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.05

Plausible(overpopulation, affect economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(inequality, is economic problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Plausible(inequality, is economic problem)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.05

Plausible(overpopulation, affect economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

Remarkable(inequality, affect economic growth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Plausible(inequality, affect economic growth)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.05

Plausible(overpopulation, affect economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

Remarkable(inequality, is economic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Plausible(inequality, is economic)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.05

Plausible(overpopulation, affect economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

Remarkable(inequality, be bad for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Plausible(inequality, be bad for economy)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.05

Plausible(overpopulation, affect economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

Remarkable(inequality, be bad for economic growth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Plausible(inequality, be bad for economic growth)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.05

Plausible(overpopulation, affect economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Salient(overpopulation, affect economy)

Similarity expansion

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.08

Salient(overpopulation, affect economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Salient(overpopulation, is economic)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.14

Remarkable(overpopulation, affect economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is economic)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.08

Salient(overpopulation, affect economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Salient(overpopulation, is economic problem)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.05

Plausible(overpopulation, affect economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is economic problem)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.14

Remarkable(overpopulation, affect economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is economic problem)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.05

Plausible(overpopulation, affect economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is economic)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.16

Typical(overpopulation, affect economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Typical(overpopulation, is economic problem)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.16

Typical(overpopulation, affect economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Typical(overpopulation, is economic)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.08

Salient(overpopulation, affect economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Typical(overpopulation, affect economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, affect economy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.05

Plausible(overpopulation, affect economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Typical(overpopulation, affect economy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, affect economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Typical(issue, affect market)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, affect economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(factor, affect business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, affect economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Typical(inequality, be good for economy)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, affect economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Typical(inequality, affect economic growth)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, affect economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(inequality, be bad for economy)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, affect economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Typical(inequality, is economic)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, affect economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Typical(inequality, is economic problem)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, affect economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(inequality, be bad for economic growth)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.16

Typical(overpopulation, affect economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Typical(issue, affect market)

0.17

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.16

Typical(overpopulation, affect economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(factor, affect business)