delaware: be good for animals

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents state
Weight: 0.60
, place
Weight: 0.59
, maryland
Weight: 0.58
, city
Weight: 0.55
, law
Weight: 0.55
Siblings wilmington
Weight: 0.56
, wyoming
Weight: 0.35
, tennessee
Weight: 0.34
, arkansas
Weight: 0.34
, springfield
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for animals 1.00
be good place live 0.76
was good 0.76
be good for business 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(maryland, be good place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(delaware, be good for animals)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(delaware, be good for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(maryland, be good place live)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(delaware, be good for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(maryland, be good place live)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(delaware, be good for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(tennessee, be good place live)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(delaware, be good for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(arkansas, be good place live)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(maryland, be good place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(delaware, be good for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(delaware, be good for animals)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(delaware, be good for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(arkansas, be good place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(arkansas, be good place live)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(delaware, be good for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(tennessee, be good place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(tennessee, be good place live)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(delaware, be good for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(delaware, be good for animals)

Similarity expansion

0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(delaware, be good for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(delaware, be good place live)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(delaware, be good for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(delaware, be good for business)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(delaware, be good for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(delaware, be good for business)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(delaware, be good for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(delaware, be good place live)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(delaware, be good for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(delaware, was good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(delaware, be good for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(delaware, be good for business)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(delaware, be good for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(delaware, be good place live)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(delaware, be good for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(delaware, be good for business)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(delaware, be good for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(delaware, was good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(delaware, be good for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(delaware, be good place live)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(delaware, be good for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(delaware, was good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(delaware, be good for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(delaware, was good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(delaware, be good for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(delaware, be good for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(delaware, be good for animals)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(delaware, be good for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(delaware, be good for animals)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(delaware, be good for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(maryland, be good place live)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(delaware, be good for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(tennessee, be good place live)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(delaware, be good for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(arkansas, be good place live)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(delaware, be good for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(maryland, be good place live)