delaware: be good for business

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents state
Weight: 0.60
, place
Weight: 0.59
, maryland
Weight: 0.58
, city
Weight: 0.55
, law
Weight: 0.55
Siblings wilmington
Weight: 0.56
, wyoming
Weight: 0.35
, tennessee
Weight: 0.34
, arkansas
Weight: 0.34
, springfield
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for business 1.00
be favorable for business 0.82
was good 0.81
has quality good 0.80
be good for corporations 0.79
be good place live 0.76
be good for animals 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(city, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(delaware, be good for business)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(state, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(delaware, be good for business)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(maryland, be good place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(delaware, be good for business)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(delaware, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(maryland, be good place live)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(delaware, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(state, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(delaware, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(city, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(delaware, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(city, has quality good)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(delaware, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(maryland, be good place live)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(delaware, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(state, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(delaware, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(tennessee, be good place live)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(delaware, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(arkansas, be good place live)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(city, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(delaware, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(delaware, be good for business)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(state, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(delaware, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(delaware, be good for business)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(maryland, be good place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(delaware, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(delaware, be good for business)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(delaware, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(arkansas, be good place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(arkansas, be good place live)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(delaware, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(tennessee, be good place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(tennessee, be good place live)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(delaware, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(delaware, be good for business)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(delaware, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(delaware, be favorable for business)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(delaware, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(delaware, be favorable for business)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(delaware, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(delaware, be favorable for business)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(delaware, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(delaware, was good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(delaware, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(delaware, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(delaware, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(delaware, be favorable for business)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(delaware, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(delaware, be good for corporations)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(delaware, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(delaware, was good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(delaware, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(delaware, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(delaware, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(delaware, be good for animals)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(delaware, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(delaware, be good for corporations)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(delaware, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(delaware, be good place live)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(delaware, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(delaware, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(delaware, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(delaware, be good for animals)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(delaware, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(delaware, was good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(delaware, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(delaware, be good for corporations)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(delaware, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(delaware, be good place live)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(delaware, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(delaware, be good for animals)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(delaware, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(delaware, be good for corporations)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(delaware, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(delaware, be good for animals)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(delaware, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(delaware, be good place live)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(delaware, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(delaware, was good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(delaware, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(delaware, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(delaware, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(delaware, be good place live)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(delaware, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(delaware, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(delaware, be good for business)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(delaware, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(delaware, be good for business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(delaware, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(maryland, be good place live)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(delaware, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(state, has quality good)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(delaware, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(city, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(delaware, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(tennessee, be good place live)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(delaware, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(arkansas, be good place live)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(delaware, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(state, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(delaware, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(maryland, be good place live)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(delaware, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(city, has quality good)