delaware: be good for corporations

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents state
Weight: 0.60
, place
Weight: 0.59
, maryland
Weight: 0.58
, city
Weight: 0.55
, law
Weight: 0.55
Siblings wilmington
Weight: 0.56
, wyoming
Weight: 0.35
, tennessee
Weight: 0.34
, arkansas
Weight: 0.34
, springfield
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for corporations 1.00
be important in corporations 0.97
be popular for corporations 0.95
have many corporations 0.95
has physical part corporations 0.93
is corporate law 0.80
be good for business 0.79
is corporate friendly 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(delaware, be good for corporations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(delaware, be good for corporations)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(delaware, be good for corporations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(delaware, be important in corporations)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(delaware, be good for corporations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(delaware, be popular for corporations)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(delaware, be good for corporations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(delaware, be popular for corporations)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(delaware, be good for corporations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(delaware, be important in corporations)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(delaware, be good for corporations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(delaware, is corporate law)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(delaware, be good for corporations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(delaware, is corporate law)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(delaware, be good for corporations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(delaware, be important in corporations)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(delaware, be good for corporations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(delaware, is corporate law)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(delaware, be good for corporations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(delaware, be important in corporations)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(delaware, be good for corporations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(delaware, be popular for corporations)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(delaware, be good for corporations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(delaware, is corporate law)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(delaware, be good for corporations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(delaware, be popular for corporations)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(delaware, be good for corporations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(delaware, be good for business)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(delaware, be good for corporations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(delaware, is corporate friendly)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(delaware, be good for corporations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(delaware, is corporate friendly)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(delaware, be good for corporations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(delaware, be good for business)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(delaware, be good for corporations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(delaware, be good for business)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(delaware, be good for corporations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(delaware, be good for business)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(delaware, be good for corporations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(delaware, is corporate friendly)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(delaware, be good for corporations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(delaware, is corporate friendly)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(delaware, be good for corporations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(delaware, be good for corporations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(delaware, be good for corporations)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(delaware, be good for corporations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(delaware, be good for corporations)