delaware: was built

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents state
Weight: 0.60
, place
Weight: 0.59
, maryland
Weight: 0.58
, city
Weight: 0.55
, law
Weight: 0.55
Siblings wilmington
Weight: 0.56
, wyoming
Weight: 0.35
, tennessee
Weight: 0.34
, arkansas
Weight: 0.34
, springfield
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
was built 1.00
was established 0.79
was created 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(law, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(delaware, was built)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(delaware, was built) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(law, was created)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(delaware, was built) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(law, was created)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(law, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(delaware, was built) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(delaware, was built)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(delaware, was built) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(delaware, was built)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(delaware, was built) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(delaware, was established)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(delaware, was built) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(delaware, was created)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(delaware, was built) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(delaware, was created)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(delaware, was built) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(delaware, was created)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(delaware, was built) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(delaware, was created)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(delaware, was built) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(delaware, was established)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(delaware, was built) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(delaware, was established)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(delaware, was built) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(delaware, was established)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(delaware, was built) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(delaware, was built) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(delaware, was built)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(delaware, was built) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(delaware, was built)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(delaware, was built) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(law, was created)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(delaware, was built) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(law, was created)