delegate: has quality function

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents official
Weight: 0.58
, person
Weight: 0.56
, election
Weight: 0.54
, ticket
Weight: 0.50
Siblings james wilson
Weight: 0.49
, general election
Weight: 0.33
, senator
Weight: 0.32
, observer
Weight: 0.32
, diplomat
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality function 1.00
has quality good 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(delegate, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(general election, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(delegate, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(general election, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(general election, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(delegate, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(delegate, has quality function)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(delegate, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(delegate, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(delegate, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(delegate, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(delegate, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(delegate, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(delegate, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(delegate, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(delegate, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(delegate, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(delegate, has quality function)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(delegate, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(delegate, has quality function)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(delegate, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(general election, has quality good)