dell: is expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents laptop
Weight: 0.62
, manufacturer
Weight: 0.59
, brand
Weight: 0.59
, vendor
Weight: 0.58
, corporation
Weight: 0.58
Siblings thinkpad
Weight: 0.35
, ipad
Weight: 0.34
, ibm
Weight: 0.34
, sony
Weight: 0.34
, toshiba
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is expensive 1.00
is ultrasharp expensive 0.82
be cheaper in us 0.80
be more expensive than lenovo 0.79
is xps expensive 0.78
is xps 13 expensive 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(laptop, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(dell, is expensive)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(brand, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(dell, is expensive)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(laptop, be cheaper in us)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(dell, is expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(dell, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(brand, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(dell, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(laptop, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(dell, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(laptop, be cheaper in us)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(dell, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(laptop, be cheaper in us)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(dell, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(brand, is expensive)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(dell, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(laptop, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(dell, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(thinkpad, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(dell, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(ipad, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(laptop, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(dell, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(dell, is expensive)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(brand, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(dell, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(dell, is expensive)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(laptop, be cheaper in us)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(dell, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(dell, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(dell, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(ipad, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(ipad, is expensive)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(dell, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(thinkpad, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(thinkpad, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(dell, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(dell, is expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(dell, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(dell, be more expensive than lenovo)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(dell, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(dell, is ultrasharp expensive)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(dell, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(dell, be cheaper in us)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(dell, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(dell, be cheaper in us)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(dell, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(dell, is xps 13 expensive)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(dell, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(dell, be more expensive than lenovo)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(dell, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(dell, be more expensive than lenovo)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(dell, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(dell, is ultrasharp expensive)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(dell, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(dell, be cheaper in us)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(dell, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(dell, is xps expensive)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(dell, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(dell, is ultrasharp expensive)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(dell, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(dell, is xps expensive)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(dell, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(dell, is xps 13 expensive)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(dell, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(dell, is xps 13 expensive)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(dell, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(dell, is xps 13 expensive)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(dell, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(dell, is xps expensive)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(dell, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(dell, be more expensive than lenovo)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(dell, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(dell, is ultrasharp expensive)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(dell, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(dell, be cheaper in us)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(dell, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(dell, is xps expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(dell, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(dell, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(dell, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(dell, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(dell, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(dell, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(laptop, be cheaper in us)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(dell, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(brand, is expensive)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(dell, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(laptop, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(dell, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(ipad, is expensive)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(dell, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(thinkpad, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(dell, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(brand, is expensive)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(dell, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(laptop, is expensive)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(dell, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(laptop, be cheaper in us)