demand: be pull inflation considered

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents commodity
Weight: 0.60
, factor
Weight: 0.59
, obstacle
Weight: 0.58
, account
Weight: 0.58
Siblings supply
Weight: 0.34
, consumption
Weight: 0.33
, fuel oil
Weight: 0.32
, gasoline
Weight: 0.32
, decline
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be pull inflation considered 1.00
be pull inflation 0.98
be pull inflation bad 0.97
pull occur inflation 0.96
rise with inflation 0.91
benefit from inflation 0.89
is inflation hedge 0.84
be hedge against inflation 0.84
hedge against inflation 0.84
be in economy 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(commodity, be hedge against inflation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(demand, be pull inflation considered)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(commodity, hedge against inflation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(demand, be pull inflation considered)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(commodity, is inflation hedge) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(demand, be pull inflation considered)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(commodity, benefit from inflation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(demand, be pull inflation considered)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(commodity, rise with inflation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(demand, be pull inflation considered)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(demand, be pull inflation considered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(commodity, rise with inflation)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(demand, be pull inflation considered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(commodity, benefit from inflation)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(demand, be pull inflation considered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(commodity, is inflation hedge)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(demand, be pull inflation considered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(commodity, hedge against inflation)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(demand, be pull inflation considered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(commodity, be hedge against inflation)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(demand, be pull inflation considered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(commodity, rise with inflation)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(demand, be pull inflation considered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(commodity, is inflation hedge)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(demand, be pull inflation considered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(commodity, benefit from inflation)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(demand, be pull inflation considered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(commodity, be hedge against inflation)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(demand, be pull inflation considered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(commodity, hedge against inflation)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(demand, be pull inflation considered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(supply, be in economy)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(commodity, rise with inflation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(demand, be pull inflation considered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(demand, be pull inflation considered)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(commodity, benefit from inflation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(demand, be pull inflation considered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(demand, be pull inflation considered)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(commodity, be hedge against inflation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(demand, be pull inflation considered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(demand, be pull inflation considered)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(commodity, hedge against inflation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(demand, be pull inflation considered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(demand, be pull inflation considered)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(commodity, is inflation hedge) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(demand, be pull inflation considered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(demand, be pull inflation considered)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(demand, be pull inflation considered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(supply, be in economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(supply, be in economy)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(demand, be pull inflation considered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(demand, be pull inflation considered)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(demand, be pull inflation considered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(demand, be pull inflation bad)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(demand, be pull inflation considered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(demand, be pull inflation bad)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(demand, be pull inflation considered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(demand, be pull inflation bad)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(demand, be pull inflation considered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(demand, pull occur inflation)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(demand, be pull inflation considered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(demand, be pull inflation bad)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(demand, be pull inflation considered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(demand, be pull inflation considered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(demand, be pull inflation considered)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(demand, be pull inflation considered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(demand, be pull inflation considered)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(demand, be pull inflation considered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(commodity, rise with inflation)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(demand, be pull inflation considered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(commodity, benefit from inflation)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(demand, be pull inflation considered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(commodity, is inflation hedge)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(demand, be pull inflation considered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(commodity, hedge against inflation)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(demand, be pull inflation considered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(commodity, be hedge against inflation)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(demand, be pull inflation considered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(supply, be in economy)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(demand, be pull inflation considered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(commodity, rise with inflation)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(demand, be pull inflation considered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(commodity, benefit from inflation)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(demand, be pull inflation considered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(commodity, is inflation hedge)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(demand, be pull inflation considered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(commodity, hedge against inflation)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(demand, be pull inflation considered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(commodity, be hedge against inflation)