demand: be pull inflation bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents commodity
Weight: 0.60
, factor
Weight: 0.59
, obstacle
Weight: 0.58
, account
Weight: 0.58
Siblings supply
Weight: 0.34
, consumption
Weight: 0.33
, fuel oil
Weight: 0.32
, gasoline
Weight: 0.32
, decline
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be pull inflation bad 1.00
be pull inflation 0.99
be pull inflation considered 0.97
pull occur inflation 0.96
rise with inflation 0.91
benefit from inflation 0.89
is inflation hedge 0.84
be hedge against inflation 0.84
hedge against inflation 0.84
be good for economy 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(commodity, be hedge against inflation)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(demand, be pull inflation bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(commodity, hedge against inflation)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(demand, be pull inflation bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(commodity, is inflation hedge)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(demand, be pull inflation bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(commodity, benefit from inflation)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(demand, be pull inflation bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(commodity, rise with inflation)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(demand, be pull inflation bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(demand, be pull inflation bad)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(commodity, rise with inflation)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(demand, be pull inflation bad)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(commodity, benefit from inflation)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(demand, be pull inflation bad)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(commodity, is inflation hedge)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(demand, be pull inflation bad)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(commodity, hedge against inflation)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(demand, be pull inflation bad)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(commodity, be hedge against inflation)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(demand, be pull inflation bad)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(commodity, rise with inflation)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(demand, be pull inflation bad)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(commodity, benefit from inflation)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(demand, be pull inflation bad)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(commodity, is inflation hedge)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(demand, be pull inflation bad)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(commodity, be hedge against inflation)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(demand, be pull inflation bad)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(commodity, hedge against inflation)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(demand, be pull inflation bad)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(consumption, be good for economy)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(commodity, rise with inflation)
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(demand, be pull inflation bad)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(demand, be pull inflation bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(commodity, benefit from inflation)
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(demand, be pull inflation bad)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(demand, be pull inflation bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(commodity, be hedge against inflation)
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(demand, be pull inflation bad)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(demand, be pull inflation bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(commodity, hedge against inflation)
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(demand, be pull inflation bad)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(demand, be pull inflation bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(commodity, is inflation hedge)
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(demand, be pull inflation bad)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(demand, be pull inflation bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(demand, be pull inflation bad)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(consumption, be good for economy)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(consumption, be good for economy)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(demand, be pull inflation bad)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(demand, be pull inflation bad)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(demand, be pull inflation bad)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(demand, be pull inflation considered)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(demand, be pull inflation bad)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(demand, be pull inflation considered)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(demand, be pull inflation bad)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(demand, be pull inflation considered)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(demand, be pull inflation bad)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(demand, be pull inflation considered)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(demand, be pull inflation bad)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(demand, pull occur inflation)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(demand, be pull inflation bad)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(demand, be pull inflation bad)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(demand, be pull inflation bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(demand, be pull inflation bad)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(demand, be pull inflation bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(demand, be pull inflation bad)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(commodity, rise with inflation)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(demand, be pull inflation bad)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(commodity, benefit from inflation)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(demand, be pull inflation bad)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(commodity, is inflation hedge)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(demand, be pull inflation bad)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(commodity, hedge against inflation)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(demand, be pull inflation bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(commodity, be hedge against inflation)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(demand, be pull inflation bad)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(consumption, be good for economy)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(demand, be pull inflation bad)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(commodity, rise with inflation)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(demand, be pull inflation bad)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(commodity, benefit from inflation)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(demand, be pull inflation bad)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(commodity, is inflation hedge)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(demand, be pull inflation bad)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(commodity, hedge against inflation)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(demand, be pull inflation bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(commodity, be hedge against inflation)