demand: be related to future price of good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents commodity
Weight: 0.60
, factor
Weight: 0.59
, obstacle
Weight: 0.58
, account
Weight: 0.58
Siblings supply
Weight: 0.34
, consumption
Weight: 0.33
, fuel oil
Weight: 0.32
, gasoline
Weight: 0.32
, decline
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related to future price of good 1.00
be related to future price 0.98
affect price 0.87
affect price of product 0.84
go up in price 0.83
go up with price 0.83
affect prices 0.82
influence market price 0.82
be affected by fall in price level 0.81
affect prices in free enterprise system 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(demand, be related to future price of good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(supply, go up with price)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(demand, be related to future price of good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(supply, affect prices in free enterprise system)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(demand, be related to future price of good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(gasoline, go up in price)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(demand, be related to future price of good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(supply, influence market price)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(demand, be related to future price of good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(supply, affect price)
...

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(demand, be related to future price of good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(supply, affect price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(supply, affect price)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(demand, be related to future price of good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(supply, affect price of product) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(supply, affect price of product)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(demand, be related to future price of good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(supply, affect prices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(supply, affect prices)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(demand, be related to future price of good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(gasoline, go up in price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(gasoline, go up in price)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(demand, be related to future price of good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(supply, influence market price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(supply, influence market price)
...

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(demand, be related to future price of good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(demand, be related to future price of good)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(demand, be related to future price of good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(demand, affect price)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(demand, be related to future price of good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(demand, affect price of product)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(demand, be related to future price of good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(demand, affect prices)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(demand, be related to future price of good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(demand, affect price)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(demand, be related to future price of good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(demand, affect price)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(demand, be related to future price of good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(demand, be related to future price of good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(demand, be related to future price of good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(demand, be related to future price of good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(demand, be related to future price of good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(demand, be related to future price of good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(supply, affect price)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(demand, be related to future price of good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(supply, affect prices)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(demand, be related to future price of good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(supply, go up with price)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(demand, be related to future price of good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(supply, affect price of product)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(demand, be related to future price of good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(gasoline, go up in price)
...