demand: influence market price

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents commodity
Weight: 0.60
, factor
Weight: 0.59
, obstacle
Weight: 0.58
, account
Weight: 0.58
Siblings supply
Weight: 0.34
, consumption
Weight: 0.33
, fuel oil
Weight: 0.32
, gasoline
Weight: 0.32
, decline
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
influence market price 1.00
affect price 0.87
affect price of product 0.84
affect prices 0.83
be related to future price 0.83
be related to future price of good 0.82
go up in price 0.81
has quality prices 0.81
affect prices in enterprise system 0.81
drive market economy 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(demand, influence market price)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(supply, drive market economy)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(demand, influence market price)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(gasoline, has quality prices)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(demand, influence market price)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(supply, influence market price)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(demand, influence market price)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(supply, affect prices in enterprise system)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(demand, influence market price)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(gasoline, go up in price)
...

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(demand, influence market price)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(supply, influence market price)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(supply, influence market price)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(demand, influence market price)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(supply, affect price)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(supply, affect price)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(demand, influence market price)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(supply, affect price of product)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(supply, affect price of product)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(demand, influence market price)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(supply, affect prices)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(supply, affect prices)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(demand, influence market price)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(gasoline, go up in price)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(gasoline, go up in price)
...

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(demand, influence market price)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(demand, influence market price)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(demand, influence market price)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(demand, affect price)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(demand, influence market price)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(demand, affect price of product)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(demand, influence market price)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(demand, affect prices)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(demand, influence market price)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(demand, affect price)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(demand, influence market price)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(demand, affect price)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(demand, influence market price)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(demand, influence market price)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(demand, influence market price)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(demand, influence market price)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(demand, influence market price)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(demand, influence market price)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(supply, affect price)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(demand, influence market price)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(supply, affect prices)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(demand, influence market price)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(supply, influence market price)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(demand, influence market price)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(supply, affect price of product)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(demand, influence market price)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(gasoline, go up in price)
...