gasoline: has quality prices

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fuel
Weight: 0.70
, commodity
Weight: 0.68
, gas
Weight: 0.66
, natural gas
Weight: 0.65
, chemical
Weight: 0.64
Siblings fuel oil
Weight: 0.40
, petrol
Weight: 0.39
, diesel
Weight: 0.38
, noble gas
Weight: 0.37
, mustard gas
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality prices 1.00
go up in price 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(gasoline, has quality prices)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(petrol, has quality prices)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(gasoline, has quality prices)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(petrol, go up in price)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(gasoline, has quality prices)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(petrol, has quality prices)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(petrol, has quality prices)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(gasoline, has quality prices)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(petrol, go up in price)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(petrol, go up in price)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(gasoline, has quality prices)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(gasoline, has quality prices)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(gasoline, has quality prices)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(gasoline, go up in price)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(gasoline, has quality prices)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(gasoline, go up in price)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(gasoline, has quality prices)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(gasoline, go up in price)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(gasoline, has quality prices)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(gasoline, go up in price)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(gasoline, has quality prices)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(gasoline, has quality prices)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(gasoline, has quality prices)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(gasoline, has quality prices)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(gasoline, has quality prices)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(gasoline, has quality prices)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(petrol, has quality prices)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(gasoline, has quality prices)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(petrol, go up in price)