democrat: be compared to 1980 republicans

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents liberal
Weight: 0.71
, candidate
Weight: 0.63
, politician
Weight: 0.60
, critic
Weight: 0.60
, third party
Weight: 0.56
Siblings senator
Weight: 0.69
, congressman
Weight: 0.65
, gore
Weight: 0.51
, democratic party
Weight: 0.35
, libertarian
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be compared to 1980 republicans 1.00
be better than republicans 0.93
hate republicans 0.92
run as republicans 0.92
be afraid of republicans 0.91
think republicans hate 0.90
be worried about loss to republicans 0.87
be smarter than republicans 0.86
be much smarter than republicans 0.85
be worried about loss of one seat to republicans 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(democrat, be compared to 1980 republicans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(libertarian, run as republicans)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(democrat, be compared to 1980 republicans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(libertarian, run as republicans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(libertarian, run as republicans)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(democrat, be compared to 1980 republicans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(democrat, be compared to 1980 republicans)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(democrat, be compared to 1980 republicans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(democrat, hate republicans)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(democrat, be compared to 1980 republicans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(democrat, hate republicans)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(democrat, be compared to 1980 republicans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(democrat, hate republicans)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(democrat, be compared to 1980 republicans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(democrat, hate republicans)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(democrat, be compared to 1980 republicans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(democrat, run as republicans)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(democrat, be compared to 1980 republicans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(democrat, run as republicans)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(democrat, be compared to 1980 republicans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(democrat, run as republicans)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(democrat, be compared to 1980 republicans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(democrat, be better than republicans)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(democrat, be compared to 1980 republicans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(democrat, run as republicans)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(democrat, be compared to 1980 republicans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(democrat, be better than republicans)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(democrat, be compared to 1980 republicans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(democrat, be worried about loss of one seat to republicans)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(democrat, be compared to 1980 republicans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(democrat, be better than republicans)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(democrat, be compared to 1980 republicans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(democrat, be worried about loss of one seat to republicans)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(democrat, be compared to 1980 republicans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(democrat, be worried about loss of one seat to republicans)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(democrat, be compared to 1980 republicans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(democrat, be worried about loss of one seat to republicans)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(democrat, be compared to 1980 republicans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(democrat, be better than republicans)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(democrat, be compared to 1980 republicans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(democrat, be compared to 1980 republicans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(democrat, be compared to 1980 republicans)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(democrat, be compared to 1980 republicans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(democrat, be compared to 1980 republicans)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(democrat, be compared to 1980 republicans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(libertarian, run as republicans)