democrat: run as republicans

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents liberal
Weight: 0.71
, candidate
Weight: 0.63
, politician
Weight: 0.60
, critic
Weight: 0.60
, third party
Weight: 0.56
Siblings senator
Weight: 0.69
, congressman
Weight: 0.65
, gore
Weight: 0.51
, democratic party
Weight: 0.35
, libertarian
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
run as republicans 1.00
hate republicans 0.95
be better than republicans 0.93
be afraid of republicans 0.93
think republicans hate 0.92
be compared to 1980 republicans 0.92
run as democrats 0.87
be smarter than republicans 0.86
be worried about loss to republicans 0.86
be much smarter than republicans 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(democrat, run as republicans)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(libertarian, run as republicans)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(democrat, run as republicans)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(libertarian, run as republicans)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(libertarian, run as republicans)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(democrat, run as republicans)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(democrat, run as republicans)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(democrat, run as republicans)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(democrat, hate republicans)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(democrat, run as republicans)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(democrat, hate republicans)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(democrat, run as republicans)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(democrat, hate republicans)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(democrat, run as republicans)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(democrat, hate republicans)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(democrat, run as republicans)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(democrat, be better than republicans)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(democrat, run as republicans)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(democrat, be compared to 1980 republicans)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(democrat, run as republicans)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(democrat, be compared to 1980 republicans)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(democrat, run as republicans)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(democrat, be better than republicans)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(democrat, run as republicans)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(democrat, be compared to 1980 republicans)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(democrat, run as republicans)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(democrat, be compared to 1980 republicans)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(democrat, run as republicans)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(democrat, be better than republicans)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(democrat, run as republicans)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(democrat, be better than republicans)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(democrat, run as republicans)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(democrat, run as republicans)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(democrat, run as republicans)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(democrat, run as republicans)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(democrat, run as republicans)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(democrat, run as republicans)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(libertarian, run as republicans)