denim: be considerered bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fabric
Weight: 0.64
, item
Weight: 0.60
, material
Weight: 0.59
, trend
Weight: 0.57
Siblings silk
Weight: 0.35
, cashmere
Weight: 0.35
, jeans
Weight: 0.35
, wool
Weight: 0.35
, polyester
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considerered bad 1.00
has quality bad 0.86
be bad for environment 0.82
has quality good 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(fabric, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(denim, be considerered bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(fabric, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(denim, be considerered bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(denim, be considerered bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(fabric, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(denim, be considerered bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(fabric, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(denim, be considerered bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(fabric, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(denim, be considerered bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(fabric, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(denim, be considerered bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(silk, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(denim, be considerered bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(wool, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(denim, be considerered bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(polyester, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(denim, be considerered bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(cashmere, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(denim, be considerered bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(polyester, be bad for environment)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(denim, be considerered bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(jeans, be bad for environment)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(denim, be considerered bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(polyester, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(denim, be considerered bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(wool, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(denim, be considerered bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(cashmere, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(denim, be considerered bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(silk, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(fabric, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(denim, be considerered bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(denim, be considerered bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(fabric, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(denim, be considerered bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(denim, be considerered bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(denim, be considerered bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(silk, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(silk, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(denim, be considerered bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(wool, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(wool, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(denim, be considerered bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(polyester, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(polyester, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(denim, be considerered bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(polyester, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(polyester, be bad for environment)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(denim, be considerered bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(cashmere, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(cashmere, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(denim, be considerered bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(silk, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(silk, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(denim, be considerered bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(cashmere, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(cashmere, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(denim, be considerered bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(wool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(wool, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(denim, be considerered bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(jeans, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(jeans, be bad for environment)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(denim, be considerered bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(polyester, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(polyester, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(denim, be considerered bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(denim, be considerered bad)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(denim, be considerered bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(denim, be bad for environment)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(denim, be considerered bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(denim, be bad for environment)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(denim, be considerered bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(denim, be bad for environment)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(denim, be considerered bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(denim, be bad for environment)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(denim, be considerered bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(denim, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(denim, be considerered bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(denim, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(denim, be considerered bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(denim, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(denim, be considerered bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(denim, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(denim, be considerered bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(denim, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(denim, be considerered bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(denim, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(denim, be considerered bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(denim, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(denim, be considerered bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(denim, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(denim, be considerered bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(denim, be considerered bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(denim, be considerered bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(denim, be considerered bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(denim, be considerered bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(denim, be considerered bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(fabric, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(denim, be considerered bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(fabric, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(denim, be considerered bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(polyester, be bad for environment)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(denim, be considerered bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(silk, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(denim, be considerered bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(polyester, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(denim, be considerered bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(wool, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(denim, be considerered bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(cashmere, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(denim, be considerered bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(jeans, be bad for environment)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(denim, be considerered bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(cashmere, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(denim, be considerered bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(silk, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(denim, be considerered bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(polyester, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(denim, be considerered bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(wool, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(denim, be considerered bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(fabric, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(denim, be considerered bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(fabric, has quality good)