wool: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fabric
Weight: 0.70
, raw material
Weight: 0.66
, commodity
Weight: 0.65
, fiber
Weight: 0.63
Siblings cashmere
Weight: 0.56
, shetland
Weight: 0.49
, tweed
Weight: 0.45
, silk
Weight: 0.37
, cotton
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
was good 0.84
is one good 0.83
is great 0.81
be great 0.80
feel good 0.80
has quality news 0.79
be necessary for good health 0.79
has quality resources 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(fabric, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(wool, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(fiber, be necessary for good health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(wool, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(fabric, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(wool, has quality good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(commodity, has quality news) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(wool, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(wool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(fabric, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(wool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(fabric, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(wool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(commodity, has quality news)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(wool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(fiber, be necessary for good health)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(wool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(fabric, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(wool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(fabric, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(wool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(fiber, be necessary for good health)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(wool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(commodity, has quality news)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(wool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(silk, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(wool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(cashmere, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(wool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(cotton, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(wool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(cashmere, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(wool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(cashmere, is great)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(wool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(silk, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(wool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(cotton, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(wool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(shetland, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(wool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(cashmere, be great)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(wool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(silk, was good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(fabric, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(wool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(wool, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(fabric, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(wool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(wool, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(fiber, be necessary for good health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(wool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(wool, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(commodity, has quality news) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(wool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(wool, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(wool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(shetland, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(shetland, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(wool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(cotton, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(cotton, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(wool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(silk, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(silk, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(wool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(cashmere, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(cashmere, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(wool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(silk, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(silk, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(wool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(cashmere, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(cashmere, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(wool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(cotton, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(cotton, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(wool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(silk, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(silk, was good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(wool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(cashmere, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(cashmere, is great)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(wool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(cashmere, be great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(cashmere, be great)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(wool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(wool, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(wool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(wool, has quality bad)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(wool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(wool, has quality bad)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(wool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(wool, has quality bad)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(wool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(wool, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(wool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(wool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(wool, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(wool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(wool, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(wool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(commodity, has quality news)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(wool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(fabric, has quality bad)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(wool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(fabric, has quality good)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(wool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(fiber, be necessary for good health)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(wool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(silk, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(wool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(cashmere, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(wool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(shetland, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(wool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(cashmere, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(wool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(cotton, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(wool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(silk, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(wool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(cotton, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(wool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(silk, was good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(wool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(cashmere, be great)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(wool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(cashmere, is great)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(wool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(fabric, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(wool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(fabric, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(wool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(commodity, has quality news)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(wool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(fiber, be necessary for good health)