silk: was good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fabric
Weight: 0.71
, material
Weight: 0.64
, textile
Weight: 0.60
, commodity
Weight: 0.59
Siblings linen
Weight: 0.37
, velvet
Weight: 0.37
, rayon
Weight: 0.37
, cashmere
Weight: 0.37
, wool
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
was good 1.00
feel good 0.84
has quality good 0.84
is great 0.83
be great 0.81
has quality bad 0.81
be good for summer 0.79
be good for winter 0.77
be good for weather 0.77
be bad for environment 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(textile, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(silk, was good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(fabric, be good for winter)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(silk, was good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(fabric, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(silk, was good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(fabric, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(silk, was good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(textile, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(silk, was good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(silk, was good)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(textile, be bad for environment)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(silk, was good)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(fabric, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(silk, was good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(fabric, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(silk, was good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(textile, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(silk, was good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(fabric, be good for winter)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(silk, was good)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(textile, be bad for environment)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(silk, was good)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(fabric, has quality bad)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(silk, was good)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(fabric, be good for winter)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(silk, was good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(textile, has quality good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(silk, was good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(fabric, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(silk, was good)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(linen, be good for summer)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(silk, was good)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(wool, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(silk, was good)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(cashmere, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(silk, was good)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(wool, be good for winter)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(silk, was good)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(linen, be good for weather)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(silk, was good)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(cashmere, is great)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(silk, was good)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(cashmere, be great)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(silk, was good)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(linen, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(silk, was good)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(rayon, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(silk, was good)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(wool, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(silk, was good)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(cashmere, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(silk, was good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(rayon, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(textile, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(silk, was good)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(silk, was good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(fabric, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(silk, was good)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(silk, was good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(fabric, be good for winter)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(silk, was good)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(silk, was good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(fabric, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(silk, was good)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(silk, was good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(textile, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(silk, was good)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(silk, was good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(silk, was good)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(linen, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(linen, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(silk, was good)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(rayon, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(rayon, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(silk, was good)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(cashmere, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(cashmere, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(silk, was good)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(wool, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(wool, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(silk, was good)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(linen, be good for summer)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(linen, be good for summer)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(silk, was good)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(wool, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(wool, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(silk, was good)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(cashmere, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(cashmere, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(silk, was good)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(cashmere, is great)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(cashmere, is great)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(silk, was good)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(cashmere, be great)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(cashmere, be great)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(silk, was good)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(rayon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(rayon, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(silk, was good)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(wool, be good for winter)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(wool, be good for winter)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(silk, was good)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(linen, be good for weather)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(linen, be good for weather)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(silk, was good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(silk, was good)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(silk, was good)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(silk, has quality bad)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(silk, was good)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(silk, has quality bad)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(silk, was good)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(silk, has quality bad)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(silk, was good)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(silk, has quality good)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(silk, was good)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(silk, has quality bad)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(silk, was good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(silk, has quality good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(silk, was good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(silk, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(silk, was good)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(silk, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(silk, was good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(silk, was good)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(silk, was good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(silk, was good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(silk, was good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(silk, was good)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(textile, be bad for environment)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(silk, was good)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(fabric, has quality bad)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(silk, was good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(fabric, has quality good)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(silk, was good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(textile, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(silk, was good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(fabric, be good for winter)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(silk, was good)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(linen, be good for summer)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(silk, was good)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(linen, be good for weather)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(silk, was good)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(wool, be good for winter)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(silk, was good)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(wool, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(silk, was good)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(cashmere, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(silk, was good)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(linen, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(silk, was good)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(cashmere, be great)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(silk, was good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(cashmere, is great)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(silk, was good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(cashmere, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(silk, was good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(rayon, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(silk, was good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(rayon, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(silk, was good)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(wool, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(silk, was good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(fabric, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(silk, was good)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(fabric, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(silk, was good)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(textile, be bad for environment)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(silk, was good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(textile, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(silk, was good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(fabric, be good for winter)