density: be related to convection currents

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents variable
Weight: 0.70
, parameter
Weight: 0.67
, characteristic
Weight: 0.66
, property
Weight: 0.62
, factor
Weight: 0.62
Siblings throughput
Weight: 0.35
, frequency
Weight: 0.35
, viscosity
Weight: 0.35
, modulus
Weight: 0.35
, amplitude
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related to convection currents 1.00
be involved in convection 0.92
be involed in process of convection 0.87
affect compressional wave 0.78
be related to waves energy 0.75
be related to temperature 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(density, be related to convection currents) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(amplitude, affect compressional wave)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(density, be related to convection currents) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(amplitude, be related to waves energy)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(density, be related to convection currents) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(amplitude, affect compressional wave) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(amplitude, affect compressional wave)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(density, be related to convection currents) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(amplitude, be related to waves energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(amplitude, be related to waves energy)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(density, be related to convection currents) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(density, be related to convection currents)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(density, be related to convection currents) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(density, be involved in convection)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(density, be related to convection currents) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(density, be involved in convection)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(density, be related to convection currents) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(density, be involved in convection)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(density, be related to convection currents) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(density, be related to temperature)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(density, be related to convection currents) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(density, be related to temperature)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(density, be related to convection currents) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(density, be related to temperature)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(density, be related to convection currents) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(density, be involved in convection)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(density, be related to convection currents) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(density, be related to temperature)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(density, be related to convection currents) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(density, be related to convection currents) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(density, be related to convection currents)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(density, be related to convection currents) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(density, be related to convection currents)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(density, be related to convection currents) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(amplitude, affect compressional wave)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(density, be related to convection currents) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(amplitude, be related to waves energy)