dent: be in cans

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.55
, accident
Weight: 0.53
, product
Weight: 0.50
, force
Weight: 0.47
, problem
Weight: 0.46
Siblings hiccup
Weight: 0.32
, dim sum
Weight: 0.31
, boost
Weight: 0.31
, damper
Weight: 0.31
, hurdle
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in cans 1.00
be in cans bad 0.97
be in milk jugs 0.80
be in wine bottles 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(dent, be in cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(dent, be in cans)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(dent, be in cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(dent, be in cans bad)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(dent, be in cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(dent, be in cans bad)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(dent, be in cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(dent, be in cans bad)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(dent, be in cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(dent, be in milk jugs)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(dent, be in cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(dent, be in milk jugs)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(dent, be in cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(dent, be in wine bottles)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(dent, be in cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(dent, be in milk jugs)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(dent, be in cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(dent, be in wine bottles)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(dent, be in cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(dent, be in cans bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(dent, be in cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(dent, be in wine bottles)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(dent, be in cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(dent, be in milk jugs)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(dent, be in cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(dent, be in wine bottles)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(dent, be in cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(dent, be in cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(dent, be in cans)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(dent, be in cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(dent, be in cans)