dent: be in milk jugs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.55
, accident
Weight: 0.53
, product
Weight: 0.50
, force
Weight: 0.47
, problem
Weight: 0.46
Siblings hiccup
Weight: 0.32
, dim sum
Weight: 0.31
, boost
Weight: 0.31
, damper
Weight: 0.31
, hurdle
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in milk jugs 1.00
be in cans 0.80
be in wine bottles 0.80
be in cans bad 0.79
be in bottom of wine bottle 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(dent, be in milk jugs)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(dent, be in milk jugs)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(dent, be in milk jugs)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(dent, be in wine bottles)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(dent, be in milk jugs)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(dent, be in wine bottles)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(dent, be in milk jugs)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(dent, be in bottom of wine bottle)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(dent, be in milk jugs)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(dent, be in cans bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(dent, be in milk jugs)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(dent, be in cans)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(dent, be in milk jugs)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(dent, be in cans)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(dent, be in milk jugs)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(dent, be in cans)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(dent, be in milk jugs)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(dent, be in cans bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(dent, be in milk jugs)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(dent, be in bottom of wine bottle)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(dent, be in milk jugs)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(dent, be in wine bottles)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(dent, be in milk jugs)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(dent, be in cans bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(dent, be in milk jugs)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(dent, be in cans bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(dent, be in milk jugs)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(dent, be in bottom of wine bottle)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(dent, be in milk jugs)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(dent, be in wine bottles)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(dent, be in milk jugs)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(dent, be in cans)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(dent, be in milk jugs)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(dent, be in bottom of wine bottle)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(dent, be in milk jugs)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(dent, be in milk jugs)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(dent, be in milk jugs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(dent, be in milk jugs)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(dent, be in milk jugs)