:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(denver, is cold)
⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(utah, is dry)
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(denver, is cold)
⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(utah, is dry)
⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(utah, is dry)
Salient implies Plausible
0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(denver, is cold)
⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(denver, is cold)
Similarity expansion
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(denver, is cold)
⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(denver, is dry)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(denver, is cold)
⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(denver, is dry)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(denver, is cold)
⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(denver, is dry)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(denver, is cold)
⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(denver, is dry)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(denver, is cold)
⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(denver, is cold)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(denver, is cold)
⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(utah, is dry)