:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(utah, is dry)
⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(denver, is dry)
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(utah, is dry)
⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(denver, is dry)
⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(denver, is dry)
Salient implies Plausible
0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(utah, is dry)
⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(utah, is dry)
Similarity expansion
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(utah, is dry)
⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(utah, is dry state)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(utah, is dry)
⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(utah, is dry state)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(utah, is dry)
⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(utah, is dry state)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(utah, is dry)
⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(utah, is dry state)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(utah, is dry)
⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(utah, is dry)
⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(utah, is dry)
Typical implies Plausible
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(utah, is dry)
⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(utah, is dry)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(utah, is dry)
⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(denver, is dry)