deposition: has quality questions

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents document
Weight: 0.68
, statement
Weight: 0.62
, function
Weight: 0.61
, trial
Weight: 0.60
Siblings testimony
Weight: 0.63
, affidavit
Weight: 0.35
, filing
Weight: 0.34
, subpoena
Weight: 0.34
, transcript
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality questions 1.00
questions 0.92
be different from questions 0.88
has quality good 0.76
has quality better 0.76
has quality bad 0.75
has quality change 0.75
has quality changes 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(trial, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(deposition, has quality questions)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(statement, be different from questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(deposition, has quality questions)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(deposition, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(statement, be different from questions)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(deposition, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(trial, has quality better)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(deposition, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(trial, has quality better)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(deposition, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(statement, be different from questions)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(deposition, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(testimony, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(deposition, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(filing, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(deposition, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(affidavit, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(deposition, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(filing, has quality better)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(statement, be different from questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(deposition, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(deposition, has quality questions)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(trial, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(deposition, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(deposition, has quality questions)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(deposition, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(affidavit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(affidavit, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(deposition, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(filing, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(filing, has quality better)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(deposition, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(testimony, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(testimony, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(deposition, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(filing, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(filing, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(deposition, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(deposition, has quality questions)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(deposition, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(deposition, questions)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(deposition, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(deposition, questions)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(deposition, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(deposition, questions)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(deposition, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(deposition, has quality change)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(deposition, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(deposition, has quality change)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(deposition, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(deposition, has quality change)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(deposition, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(deposition, has quality change)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(deposition, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(deposition, questions)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(deposition, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(deposition, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(deposition, has quality questions)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(deposition, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(deposition, has quality questions)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(deposition, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(statement, be different from questions)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(deposition, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(trial, has quality better)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(deposition, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(testimony, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(deposition, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(affidavit, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(deposition, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(filing, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(deposition, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(filing, has quality better)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(deposition, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(statement, be different from questions)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(deposition, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(trial, has quality better)