design software: causes have architecture to use

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents -
Siblings -

Related properties

Property Similarity
causes have architecture to use 1.00
causes use iterative design model 0.79
requires know about design pattern 0.78
causes design software bug 0.77
requires study design pattern 0.76
be used to aid design 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(design software, causes have architecture to use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(design software, causes have architecture to use)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(design software, causes have architecture to use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(design software, causes design software bug)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(design software, causes have architecture to use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(design software, causes use iterative design model)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(design software, causes have architecture to use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(design software, causes design software bug)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(design software, causes have architecture to use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(design software, requires know about design pattern)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(design software, causes have architecture to use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(design software, requires study design pattern)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(design software, causes have architecture to use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(design software, be used to aid design)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(design software, causes have architecture to use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(design software, causes use iterative design model)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(design software, causes have architecture to use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(design software, requires study design pattern)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(design software, causes have architecture to use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(design software, requires know about design pattern)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(design software, causes have architecture to use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(design software, requires know about design pattern)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(design software, causes have architecture to use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(design software, be used to aid design)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(design software, causes have architecture to use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(design software, be used to aid design)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(design software, causes have architecture to use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(design software, causes use iterative design model)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(design software, causes have architecture to use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(design software, be used to aid design)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(design software, causes have architecture to use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(design software, requires study design pattern)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(design software, causes have architecture to use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(design software, causes use iterative design model)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(design software, causes have architecture to use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(design software, requires know about design pattern)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(design software, causes have architecture to use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(design software, causes design software bug)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(design software, causes have architecture to use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(design software, requires study design pattern)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(design software, causes have architecture to use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(design software, causes design software bug)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(design software, causes have architecture to use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(design software, causes have architecture to use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(design software, causes have architecture to use)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(design software, causes have architecture to use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(design software, causes have architecture to use)