design software: requires know about design pattern

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents -
Siblings -

Related properties

Property Similarity
requires know about design pattern 1.00
requires study design pattern 0.92
causes use iterative design model 0.79
causes have architecture to use 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(design software, requires know about design pattern)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(design software, requires know about design pattern)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(design software, requires know about design pattern)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(design software, requires study design pattern)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(design software, requires know about design pattern)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(design software, requires study design pattern)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(design software, requires know about design pattern)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(design software, requires study design pattern)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(design software, requires know about design pattern)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(design software, causes use iterative design model)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(design software, requires know about design pattern)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(design software, causes have architecture to use)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(design software, requires know about design pattern)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(design software, causes use iterative design model)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(design software, requires know about design pattern)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(design software, causes have architecture to use)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(design software, requires know about design pattern)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(design software, causes have architecture to use)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(design software, requires know about design pattern)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(design software, requires study design pattern)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(design software, requires know about design pattern)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(design software, causes use iterative design model)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(design software, requires know about design pattern)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(design software, causes have architecture to use)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(design software, requires know about design pattern)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(design software, causes use iterative design model)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(design software, requires know about design pattern)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(design software, requires know about design pattern)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(design software, requires know about design pattern)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(design software, requires know about design pattern)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(design software, requires know about design pattern)