Dice
About
Dialogues
Browse full collection
design software
:
requires expertise
from
ConceptNet
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
Plausible
Typical
Remarkable
Salient
Related concepts
Parents
-
Siblings
-
Related properties
Property
Similarity
requires expertise
1.00
requires knowledge
0.84
requires experience
0.83
requires discipline domain knowledge and design experience
0.81
Priors about this statement
Cues
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
Joint
Necessity
Sufficiency
Implication
Entailment
Contradiction
Entropy
Evidence
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
Plausible
Typical
Remarkable
Salient
Clauses
Salient implies Plausible
0.27
Rule weight:
0.28
Evidence weight:
0.97
Similarity weight:
1.00
Evidence:
0.96
Plausible(
design software
,
requires expertise
)
⋁
Evidence:
0.87
¬ Salient(
design software
,
requires expertise
)
Similarity expansion
0.70
Rule weight:
0.85
Evidence weight:
0.97
Similarity weight:
0.84
Evidence:
0.96
Plausible(
design software
,
requires expertise
)
⋁
Evidence:
0.96
¬ Plausible(
design software
,
requires knowledge
)
0.68
Rule weight:
0.85
Evidence weight:
0.97
Similarity weight:
0.83
Evidence:
0.96
Plausible(
design software
,
requires expertise
)
⋁
Evidence:
0.95
¬ Plausible(
design software
,
requires experience
)
0.66
Rule weight:
0.85
Evidence weight:
0.97
Similarity weight:
0.81
Evidence:
0.96
Plausible(
design software
,
requires expertise
)
⋁
Evidence:
0.96
¬ Plausible(
design software
,
requires discipline domain knowledge and design experience
)
0.64
Rule weight:
0.85
Evidence weight:
0.89
Similarity weight:
0.84
Evidence:
0.13
Typical(
design software
,
requires expertise
)
⋁
Evidence:
0.13
¬ Typical(
design software
,
requires knowledge
)
0.64
Rule weight:
0.85
Evidence weight:
0.89
Similarity weight:
0.84
Evidence:
0.87
Salient(
design software
,
requires expertise
)
⋁
Evidence:
0.85
¬ Salient(
design software
,
requires knowledge
)
0.63
Rule weight:
0.85
Evidence weight:
0.89
Similarity weight:
0.83
Evidence:
0.87
Salient(
design software
,
requires expertise
)
⋁
Evidence:
0.81
¬ Salient(
design software
,
requires experience
)
0.61
Rule weight:
0.85
Evidence weight:
0.89
Similarity weight:
0.81
Evidence:
0.87
Salient(
design software
,
requires expertise
)
⋁
Evidence:
0.84
¬ Salient(
design software
,
requires discipline domain knowledge and design experience
)
0.61
Rule weight:
0.85
Evidence weight:
0.89
Similarity weight:
0.81
Evidence:
0.13
Typical(
design software
,
requires expertise
)
⋁
Evidence:
0.13
¬ Typical(
design software
,
requires discipline domain knowledge and design experience
)
0.60
Rule weight:
0.85
Evidence weight:
0.85
Similarity weight:
0.83
Evidence:
0.13
Typical(
design software
,
requires expertise
)
⋁
Evidence:
0.17
¬ Typical(
design software
,
requires experience
)
0.52
Rule weight:
0.85
Evidence weight:
0.74
Similarity weight:
0.83
Evidence:
0.52
Remarkable(
design software
,
requires expertise
)
⋁
Evidence:
0.54
¬ Remarkable(
design software
,
requires experience
)
0.50
Rule weight:
0.85
Evidence weight:
0.69
Similarity weight:
0.84
Evidence:
0.52
Remarkable(
design software
,
requires expertise
)
⋁
Evidence:
0.63
¬ Remarkable(
design software
,
requires knowledge
)
0.46
Rule weight:
0.85
Evidence weight:
0.66
Similarity weight:
0.81
Evidence:
0.52
Remarkable(
design software
,
requires expertise
)
⋁
Evidence:
0.70
¬ Remarkable(
design software
,
requires discipline domain knowledge and design experience
)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
0.14
Rule weight:
0.14
Evidence weight:
0.99
Similarity weight:
1.00
Evidence:
0.87
Salient(
design software
,
requires expertise
)
⋁
Evidence:
0.13
¬ Typical(
design software
,
requires expertise
)
⋁
Evidence:
0.52
¬ Remarkable(
design software
,
requires expertise
)
Typical implies Plausible
0.48
Rule weight:
0.48
Evidence weight:
1.00
Similarity weight:
1.00
Evidence:
0.96
Plausible(
design software
,
requires expertise
)
⋁
Evidence:
0.13
¬ Typical(
design software
,
requires expertise
)