design software: requires study problem domain carefully

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents -
Siblings -

Related properties

Property Similarity
requires study problem domain carefully 1.00
requires fully understand problem domain 0.89
requires discipline domain knowledge and design experience 0.78
requires understand problem 0.78
requires analyze problem first 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(design software, requires study problem domain carefully) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(design software, requires study problem domain carefully)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(design software, requires study problem domain carefully) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(design software, requires fully understand problem domain)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(design software, requires study problem domain carefully) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(design software, requires discipline domain knowledge and design experience)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(design software, requires study problem domain carefully) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(design software, requires understand problem)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(design software, requires study problem domain carefully) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(design software, requires analyze problem first)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(design software, requires study problem domain carefully) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(design software, requires analyze problem first)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(design software, requires study problem domain carefully) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(design software, requires fully understand problem domain)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(design software, requires study problem domain carefully) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(design software, requires analyze problem first)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(design software, requires study problem domain carefully) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(design software, requires analyze problem first)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(design software, requires study problem domain carefully) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(design software, requires discipline domain knowledge and design experience)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(design software, requires study problem domain carefully) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(design software, requires understand problem)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(design software, requires study problem domain carefully) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(design software, requires fully understand problem domain)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(design software, requires study problem domain carefully) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(design software, requires fully understand problem domain)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(design software, requires study problem domain carefully) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(design software, requires discipline domain knowledge and design experience)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(design software, requires study problem domain carefully) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(design software, requires understand problem)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(design software, requires study problem domain carefully) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(design software, requires understand problem)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(design software, requires study problem domain carefully) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(design software, requires discipline domain knowledge and design experience)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(design software, requires study problem domain carefully) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(design software, requires study problem domain carefully) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(design software, requires study problem domain carefully)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(design software, requires study problem domain carefully) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(design software, requires study problem domain carefully)