design software: requires analyze problem first

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents -
Siblings -

Related properties

Property Similarity
requires analyze problem first 1.00
requires prepare and analyze problem 0.95
requires understand problem 0.86
requires determine need 0.80
be used to solve problem 0.80
causes help solve problem 0.80
causes wrong problem to be solve 0.80
be motivated by solve problem 0.79
requires define data to be process 0.79
requires fully understand problem domain 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(design software, requires analyze problem first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(design software, requires analyze problem first)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(design software, requires analyze problem first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(design software, requires understand problem)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(design software, requires analyze problem first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(design software, requires prepare and analyze problem)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(design software, requires analyze problem first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(design software, requires determine need)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(design software, requires analyze problem first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(design software, requires prepare and analyze problem)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(design software, requires analyze problem first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(design software, causes help solve problem)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(design software, requires analyze problem first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(design software, causes help solve problem)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(design software, requires analyze problem first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(design software, be used to solve problem)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(design software, requires analyze problem first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(design software, requires fully understand problem domain)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(design software, requires analyze problem first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(design software, requires prepare and analyze problem)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(design software, requires analyze problem first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(design software, be motivated by solve problem)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(design software, requires analyze problem first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(design software, be motivated by solve problem)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(design software, requires analyze problem first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(design software, be used to solve problem)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(design software, requires analyze problem first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(design software, requires prepare and analyze problem)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(design software, requires analyze problem first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(design software, causes help solve problem)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(design software, requires analyze problem first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(design software, be used to solve problem)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(design software, requires analyze problem first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(design software, be motivated by solve problem)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(design software, requires analyze problem first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(design software, requires understand problem)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(design software, requires analyze problem first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(design software, be used to solve problem)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(design software, requires analyze problem first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(design software, be motivated by solve problem)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(design software, requires analyze problem first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(design software, requires determine need)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(design software, requires analyze problem first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(design software, requires fully understand problem domain)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(design software, requires analyze problem first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(design software, causes help solve problem)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(design software, requires analyze problem first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(design software, requires fully understand problem domain)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(design software, requires analyze problem first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(design software, requires understand problem)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(design software, requires analyze problem first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(design software, requires determine need)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(design software, requires analyze problem first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(design software, requires understand problem)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(design software, requires analyze problem first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(design software, requires fully understand problem domain)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(design software, requires analyze problem first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(design software, requires determine need)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(design software, requires analyze problem first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(design software, requires analyze problem first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(design software, requires analyze problem first)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(design software, requires analyze problem first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(design software, requires analyze problem first)