design software: causes help solve problem

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents -
Siblings -

Related properties

Property Similarity
causes help solve problem 1.00
be used to solve problem 0.98
be motivated by solve problem 0.97
causes wrong problem to be solve 0.95
requires understand problem 0.86
causes help person 0.81
requires analyze problem first 0.80
requires prepare and analyze problem 0.79
requires fully understand problem domain 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(design software, causes help solve problem)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(design software, causes help solve problem)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(design software, causes help solve problem)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(design software, be used to solve problem)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(design software, causes help solve problem)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(design software, be used to solve problem)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(design software, causes help solve problem)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(design software, requires understand problem)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(design software, causes help solve problem)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(design software, be motivated by solve problem)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(design software, causes help solve problem)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(design software, be used to solve problem)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(design software, causes help solve problem)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(design software, be motivated by solve problem)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(design software, causes help solve problem)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(design software, be motivated by solve problem)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(design software, causes help solve problem)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(design software, be motivated by solve problem)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(design software, causes help solve problem)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(design software, be used to solve problem)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(design software, causes help solve problem)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(design software, requires fully understand problem domain)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(design software, causes help solve problem)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(design software, requires prepare and analyze problem)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(design software, causes help solve problem)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(design software, requires analyze problem first)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(design software, causes help solve problem)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(design software, causes help person)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(design software, causes help solve problem)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(design software, causes help person)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(design software, causes help solve problem)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(design software, causes help person)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(design software, causes help solve problem)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(design software, requires analyze problem first)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(design software, causes help solve problem)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(design software, causes help person)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(design software, causes help solve problem)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(design software, requires understand problem)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(design software, causes help solve problem)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(design software, requires analyze problem first)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(design software, causes help solve problem)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(design software, requires prepare and analyze problem)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(design software, causes help solve problem)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(design software, requires fully understand problem domain)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(design software, causes help solve problem)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(design software, requires prepare and analyze problem)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(design software, causes help solve problem)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(design software, requires prepare and analyze problem)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(design software, causes help solve problem)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(design software, requires analyze problem first)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(design software, causes help solve problem)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(design software, requires fully understand problem domain)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(design software, causes help solve problem)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(design software, requires understand problem)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(design software, causes help solve problem)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(design software, requires fully understand problem domain)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(design software, causes help solve problem)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(design software, requires understand problem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(design software, causes help solve problem)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(design software, causes help solve problem)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(design software, causes help solve problem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(design software, causes help solve problem)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(design software, causes help solve problem)