design software: be used to solve problem

Property	Similarity
be used to solve problem	1.00
be motivated by solve problem	0.98
causes help solve problem	0.98
causes wrong problem to be solve	0.95
requires understand problem	0.87
requires analyze problem first	0.80
requires prepare and analyze problem	0.78
requires fully understand problem domain	0.76

0.78

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.19

Salient(design software, be used to solve problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Salient(design software, causes help solve problem)

0.75

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.16

Remarkable(design software, be used to solve problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Remarkable(design software, causes help solve problem)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(design software, be used to solve problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Plausible(design software, be motivated by solve problem)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(design software, be used to solve problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Plausible(design software, causes help solve problem)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.19

Salient(design software, be used to solve problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Salient(design software, be motivated by solve problem)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.51

Typical(design software, be used to solve problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Typical(design software, requires understand problem)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.16

Remarkable(design software, be used to solve problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Remarkable(design software, be motivated by solve problem)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(design software, be used to solve problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Plausible(design software, requires understand problem)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(design software, be used to solve problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Plausible(design software, requires analyze problem first)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.51

Typical(design software, be used to solve problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Typical(design software, requires fully understand problem domain)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.51

Typical(design software, be used to solve problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Typical(design software, be motivated by solve problem)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(design software, be used to solve problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Plausible(design software, requires prepare and analyze problem)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.51

Typical(design software, be used to solve problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Typical(design software, requires prepare and analyze problem)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.19

Salient(design software, be used to solve problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Salient(design software, requires analyze problem first)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(design software, be used to solve problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Plausible(design software, requires fully understand problem domain)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.51

Typical(design software, be used to solve problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(design software, causes help solve problem)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.51

Typical(design software, be used to solve problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Typical(design software, requires analyze problem first)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.16

Remarkable(design software, be used to solve problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Remarkable(design software, requires prepare and analyze problem)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.19

Salient(design software, be used to solve problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Salient(design software, requires prepare and analyze problem)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.16

Remarkable(design software, be used to solve problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Remarkable(design software, requires analyze problem first)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.16

Remarkable(design software, be used to solve problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(design software, requires fully understand problem domain)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.19

Salient(design software, be used to solve problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Salient(design software, requires understand problem)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.19

Salient(design software, be used to solve problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Salient(design software, requires fully understand problem domain)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.16

Remarkable(design software, be used to solve problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(design software, requires understand problem)

design software: be used to solve problem

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible

Parents	-
Siblings	-