design software: requires prepare and analyze problem

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents -
Siblings -

Related properties

Property Similarity
requires prepare and analyze problem 1.00
requires analyze problem first 0.95
requires understand problem 0.84
requires determine need 0.83
causes help solve problem 0.79
requires define data to be process 0.78
be used to solve problem 0.78
be motivated by solve problem 0.77
causes wrong problem to be solve 0.77
requires identify requirement 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(design software, requires prepare and analyze problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(design software, requires prepare and analyze problem)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(design software, requires prepare and analyze problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(design software, requires analyze problem first)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(design software, requires prepare and analyze problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(design software, requires analyze problem first)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(design software, requires prepare and analyze problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(design software, requires determine need)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(design software, requires prepare and analyze problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(design software, requires understand problem)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(design software, requires prepare and analyze problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(design software, causes help solve problem)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(design software, requires prepare and analyze problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(design software, requires understand problem)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(design software, requires prepare and analyze problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(design software, requires determine need)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(design software, requires prepare and analyze problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(design software, causes help solve problem)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(design software, requires prepare and analyze problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(design software, causes help solve problem)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(design software, requires prepare and analyze problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(design software, be motivated by solve problem)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(design software, requires prepare and analyze problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(design software, be used to solve problem)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(design software, requires prepare and analyze problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(design software, be used to solve problem)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(design software, requires prepare and analyze problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(design software, be motivated by solve problem)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(design software, requires prepare and analyze problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(design software, be used to solve problem)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(design software, requires prepare and analyze problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(design software, requires analyze problem first)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(design software, requires prepare and analyze problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(design software, requires identify requirement)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(design software, requires prepare and analyze problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(design software, be motivated by solve problem)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(design software, requires prepare and analyze problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(design software, requires identify requirement)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(design software, requires prepare and analyze problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(design software, requires analyze problem first)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(design software, requires prepare and analyze problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(design software, requires identify requirement)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(design software, requires prepare and analyze problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(design software, be used to solve problem)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(design software, requires prepare and analyze problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(design software, requires identify requirement)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(design software, requires prepare and analyze problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(design software, requires understand problem)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(design software, requires prepare and analyze problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(design software, be motivated by solve problem)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(design software, requires prepare and analyze problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(design software, requires determine need)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(design software, requires prepare and analyze problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(design software, causes help solve problem)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(design software, requires prepare and analyze problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(design software, requires understand problem)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(design software, requires prepare and analyze problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(design software, requires determine need)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(design software, requires prepare and analyze problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(design software, requires prepare and analyze problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(design software, requires prepare and analyze problem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(design software, requires prepare and analyze problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(design software, requires prepare and analyze problem)