design: be from different cultures

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cost
Weight: 0.64
, industry
Weight: 0.63
, approach
Weight: 0.63
, layout
Weight: 0.62
Siblings architect
Weight: 0.71
, design pattern
Weight: 0.69
, prototype
Weight: 0.63
, chevron
Weight: 0.62
, logo
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
be from different cultures 1.00
be from cultures 0.98
be from different cultures popular 0.97
be from cultures popular 0.95
affect cultures lifestyles beliefs 0.84
is different 0.81
be different across countries 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(cost, be different across countries)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(design, be from different cultures)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(design, be from different cultures)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(cost, be different across countries)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(design, be from different cultures)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(cost, be different across countries)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(cost, be different across countries)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(design, be from different cultures)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(design, be from different cultures)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(design, be from different cultures)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(design, be from different cultures)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(design, be from different cultures)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(design, be from cultures)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(design, be from different cultures)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(design, be from cultures)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(design, be from different cultures)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(design, be from different cultures popular)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(design, be from different cultures)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(design, be from cultures)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(design, be from different cultures)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(design, be from cultures popular)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(design, be from different cultures)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(design, be from cultures)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(design, be from different cultures)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(design, be from cultures popular)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(design, be from different cultures)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(design, be from cultures popular)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(design, be from different cultures)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(design, is different)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(design, be from different cultures)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(design, be from different cultures popular)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(design, be from different cultures)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(design, be from cultures popular)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(design, be from different cultures)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(design, affect cultures lifestyles beliefs)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(design, be from different cultures)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(design, be from different cultures popular)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(design, be from different cultures)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(design, be from different cultures popular)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(design, be from different cultures)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(design, affect cultures lifestyles beliefs)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(design, be from different cultures)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(design, affect cultures lifestyles beliefs)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(design, be from different cultures)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(design, affect cultures lifestyles beliefs)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(design, be from different cultures)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(design, is different)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(design, be from different cultures)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(design, is different)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(design, be from different cultures)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(design, is different)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(design, be from different cultures)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(design, be from different cultures)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(design, be from different cultures)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(design, be from different cultures)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(design, be from different cultures)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(design, be from different cultures)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(cost, be different across countries)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(design, be from different cultures)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(cost, be different across countries)