design: is different

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cost
Weight: 0.64
, industry
Weight: 0.63
, approach
Weight: 0.63
, layout
Weight: 0.62
Siblings architect
Weight: 0.71
, design pattern
Weight: 0.69
, prototype
Weight: 0.63
, chevron
Weight: 0.62
, logo
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
is different 1.00
be from different cultures popular 0.82
be from different cultures 0.81
be different across countries 0.80
be different for females 0.79
was different from late 1800s to 2014 0.78
be different for males 0.77
be identical in co-op 0.76
is interesting 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(industry, was different from late 1800s to 2014) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(design, is different)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(cost, be different for males) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(design, is different)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(cost, be different for females) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(design, is different)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(cost, be identical in co-op) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(design, is different)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(cost, be different across countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(design, is different)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(design, is different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(cost, be different across countries)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(design, is different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(cost, be identical in co-op)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(design, is different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(cost, be different for females)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(design, is different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(industry, was different from late 1800s to 2014)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(design, is different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(cost, be different for males)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(design, is different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(industry, was different from late 1800s to 2014)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(design, is different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(cost, be different for females)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(design, is different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(cost, be different for males)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(design, is different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(cost, be different across countries)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(design, is different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(cost, be identical in co-op)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(industry, was different from late 1800s to 2014) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(design, is different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(design, is different)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(cost, be different for females) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(design, is different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(design, is different)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(cost, be different for males) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(design, is different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(design, is different)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(cost, be different across countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(design, is different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(design, is different)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(cost, be identical in co-op) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(design, is different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(design, is different)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(design, is different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(design, is different)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(design, is different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(design, be from different cultures)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(design, is different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(design, be from different cultures)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(design, is different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(design, be from different cultures)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(design, is different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(design, be from different cultures popular)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(design, is different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(design, be from different cultures popular)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(design, is different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(design, is different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(design, is different)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(design, is different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(design, is different)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(design, is different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(cost, be different across countries)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(design, is different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(cost, be identical in co-op)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(design, is different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(cost, be different for females)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(design, is different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(cost, be different for males)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(design, is different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(industry, was different from late 1800s to 2014)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(design, is different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(cost, be different across countries)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(design, is different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(cost, be identical in co-op)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(design, is different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(cost, be different for females)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(design, is different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(industry, was different from late 1800s to 2014)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(design, is different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(cost, be different for males)