design: be important branding

Related concepts

Parents	cost Weight: 0.64 , industry Weight: 0.63 , approach Weight: 0.63 , layout Weight: 0.62
Siblings	architect Weight: 0.71 , design pattern Weight: 0.69 , prototype Weight: 0.63 , chevron Weight: 0.62 , logo Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be important branding	1.00
play role in branding	0.89
be important in marketing	0.85
be important for advertising	0.78
be important in advertising	0.78
be more effective for brand	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.90

Plausible(layout, be important in advertising) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(design, be important branding)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(design, be important branding) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Plausible(layout, be important in advertising)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(design, be important branding) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(layout, be important in advertising)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(design, be important branding) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(logo, play role in branding)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(design, be important branding) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Remarkable(logo, be important in advertising)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(design, be important branding) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(logo, be important for advertising)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.90

Plausible(layout, be important in advertising) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

Remarkable(design, be important branding) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Plausible(design, be important branding)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(design, be important branding) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

Remarkable(logo, play role in branding) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Plausible(logo, play role in branding)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(design, be important branding) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

Remarkable(logo, be important for advertising) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Plausible(logo, be important for advertising)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(design, be important branding) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

Remarkable(logo, be important in advertising) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Plausible(logo, be important in advertising)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(design, be important branding) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Salient(design, be important branding)

Similarity expansion

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.93

Salient(design, be important branding) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Salient(design, be important in marketing)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.78

Typical(design, be important branding) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Typical(design, be important in marketing)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(design, be important branding) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Plausible(design, be important in marketing)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.93

Salient(design, be important branding) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Salient(design, be important for advertising)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.93

Salient(design, be important branding) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Salient(design, be more effective for brand)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.78

Typical(design, be important branding) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Typical(design, be important for advertising)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(design, be important branding) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Plausible(design, be important for advertising)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.78

Remarkable(design, be important branding) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(design, be important in marketing)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(design, be important branding) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Plausible(design, be more effective for brand)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.78

Typical(design, be important branding) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(design, be more effective for brand)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.78

Remarkable(design, be important branding) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(design, be important for advertising)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.78

Remarkable(design, be important branding) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(design, be more effective for brand)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.93

Salient(design, be important branding) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(design, be important branding) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(design, be important branding)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(design, be important branding) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(design, be important branding)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.11

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(design, be important branding) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Typical(layout, be important in advertising)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(design, be important branding) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(logo, play role in branding)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(design, be important branding) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(logo, be important for advertising)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(design, be important branding) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Typical(logo, be important in advertising)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.78

Typical(design, be important branding) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Typical(layout, be important in advertising)