design: be important in marketing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cost
Weight: 0.64
, industry
Weight: 0.63
, approach
Weight: 0.63
, layout
Weight: 0.62
Siblings architect
Weight: 0.71
, design pattern
Weight: 0.69
, prototype
Weight: 0.63
, chevron
Weight: 0.62
, logo
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in marketing 1.00
be important branding 0.85
be important for advertising 0.84
be important in advertising 0.84
be important in business 0.80
be important for business 0.80
be used in advertising 0.79
play role in branding 0.78
be more effective for brand 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(layout, be important in advertising)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(design, be important in marketing)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(cost, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(design, be important in marketing)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(design, be important in marketing)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(cost, be important in business)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(design, be important in marketing)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(layout, be important in advertising)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(design, be important in marketing)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(layout, be important in advertising)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(design, be important in marketing)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(cost, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(design, be important in marketing)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(logo, be important for business)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(design, be important in marketing)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(logo, play role in branding)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(design, be important in marketing)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(logo, be important in advertising)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(design, be important in marketing)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(logo, be important for advertising)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(design, be important in marketing)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(logo, be used in advertising)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(layout, be important in advertising)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(design, be important in marketing)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(design, be important in marketing)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(cost, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(design, be important in marketing)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(design, be important in marketing)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(design, be important in marketing)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(logo, be important for advertising)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(logo, be important for advertising)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(design, be important in marketing)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(logo, be important in advertising)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(logo, be important in advertising)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(design, be important in marketing)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(logo, be used in advertising)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(logo, be used in advertising)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(design, be important in marketing)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(logo, be important for business)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(logo, be important for business)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(design, be important in marketing)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(logo, play role in branding)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(logo, play role in branding)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(design, be important in marketing)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(design, be important in marketing)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(design, be important in marketing)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(design, be important branding)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(design, be important in marketing)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(design, be important for advertising)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(design, be important in marketing)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(design, be important for advertising)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(design, be important in marketing)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(design, be important branding)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(design, be important in marketing)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(design, be important in business)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(design, be important in marketing)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(design, be important in business)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(design, be important in marketing)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(design, be more effective for brand)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(design, be important in marketing)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(design, be more effective for brand)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(design, be important in marketing)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(design, be important for advertising)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(design, be important in marketing)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(design, be important for advertising)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(design, be important in marketing)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(design, be important in business)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(design, be important in marketing)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(design, be important branding)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(design, be important in marketing)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(design, be important in business)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(design, be important in marketing)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(design, be more effective for brand)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(design, be important in marketing)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(design, be important branding)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(design, be important in marketing)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(design, be more effective for brand)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(design, be important in marketing)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(design, be important in marketing)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(design, be important in marketing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(design, be important in marketing)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(design, be important in marketing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(design, be important in marketing)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(cost, be important in business)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(design, be important in marketing)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(layout, be important in advertising)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(design, be important in marketing)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(logo, be used in advertising)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(design, be important in marketing)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(logo, be important for advertising)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(design, be important in marketing)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(logo, be important in advertising)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(design, be important in marketing)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(logo, play role in branding)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(design, be important in marketing)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(logo, be important for business)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(design, be important in marketing)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(cost, be important in business)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(design, be important in marketing)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(layout, be important in advertising)