design: be important for artist

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cost
Weight: 0.64
, industry
Weight: 0.63
, approach
Weight: 0.63
, layout
Weight: 0.62
Siblings architect
Weight: 0.71
, design pattern
Weight: 0.69
, prototype
Weight: 0.63
, chevron
Weight: 0.62
, logo
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important for artist 1.00
be different from artist 0.96
be related to art 0.76
use watercolor 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(design, be important for artist) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(architect, use watercolor)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(design, be important for artist) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(architect, use watercolor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(architect, use watercolor)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(design, be important for artist) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(design, be important for artist)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(design, be important for artist) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(design, be related to art)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(design, be important for artist) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(design, be related to art)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(design, be important for artist) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(design, be related to art)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(design, be important for artist) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(design, be related to art)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(design, be important for artist) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(design, be important for artist) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(design, be important for artist)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(design, be important for artist) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(design, be important for artist)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(design, be important for artist) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(architect, use watercolor)