design: be related to art

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cost
Weight: 0.64
, industry
Weight: 0.63
, approach
Weight: 0.63
, layout
Weight: 0.62
Siblings architect
Weight: 0.71
, design pattern
Weight: 0.69
, prototype
Weight: 0.63
, chevron
Weight: 0.62
, logo
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related to art 1.00
differ from art 0.82
is related 0.80
be important for artist 0.76
be different from artist 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(design, be related to art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(logo, is related)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(design, be related to art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(logo, is related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(logo, is related)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(design, be related to art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(design, be related to art)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(design, be related to art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(design, differ from art)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(design, be related to art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(design, differ from art)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(design, be related to art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(design, be important for artist)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(design, be related to art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(design, differ from art)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(design, be related to art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(design, differ from art)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(design, be related to art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(design, be important for artist)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(design, be related to art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(design, be important for artist)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(design, be related to art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(design, be important for artist)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(design, be related to art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(design, be related to art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(design, be related to art)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(design, be related to art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(design, be related to art)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(design, be related to art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(logo, is related)